I haven't attacked you for asking a question, I simply pointed out your rudeness by implying that the OP murdered and mutilated some foxes and fabricated a UFO story around it.

Originally posted by ALLis0NE
Having an opinion that the OP hunted and mutilated some foxes and fabricated a UFO mutilation story around it is 100% more plausible than him chasing UFOs and aliens while they are mutilating foxes, without taking pictures of the UFOs, but only the foxes.

Yes, and there are also many other possibilities (such as the sighting and the foxes to be completely unrelated, or that the "orb" was something mundane and the OP misinterpret it, etc), and yet you choose to believe the OP is deliberately trying to fool us, thus making an accusation which is based only on your interpretations of events and not in actual facts.

There may be thousands of reasons for why the OP haven't taken a pic of the orb. On the top of my head I'm thinking he may not had a camera when it happened (as he stated, he took this pictures a couple of hours later to the sighting). What I'm trying to say is that the fact that he didn't took a picture of the orb doesn't mean he's making all this up and killing foxes just to make a hoax, so your arguments to believe he's a murderer and a liar are not arguments at all but merely malicious speculation.

I know it's totally passe to agree with ALLisONE right now, but I do. The simplest answer to the question is that the OP is himself a fox hunter, took a picture of his kills, and fabricated a story around it in order to enhance his previous footage of lights.

I don't like believing that people are hoaxers, so instead I see it a bit odd that while fleeing the scene from some superbad aliens he still had time to catch his breath and take multiple, steady shots of dead foxes.

THAT being said, ALLisONE already posited a perfectly reasonable explanation (with evidence) that the foxes were killed by hunters and left.

I can't deny the OP's story, because I'm not the OP, but I can say I don't entirely believe it myself, and I think parts were either made up, embellished, or misconstrued as they occurred. I think ALLinONE brought up another good point in asking why the OP couldn't get a picture of the lights, but was able to get some very respectable shots of the foxes while he was supposed to be fleeing. The OP hasn't answered that charge, and I haven't expected him to for the entire thread, and continue not to expect it. These are all signs that something a bit less than evidence is occurring in this thread.

Feel free to target me now as well. I've disagreed with the alien theory, so I understand that there is now a target painted on my back.


Edit:

Originally posted by Radiobuzz
and yet you choose to believe the OP is deliberately trying to fool us, thus making an accusation which is based only on your interpretations of events and not in actual facts.

I'm curious how you are aware of the actual facts when the whole thing is a couple of pictures of dead foxes and a spoken story.

[edit on 30-10-2009 by EsSeeEye]

PLEASE People ! Stop the Personal Sniping and stay on Topic !

Originally posted by EsSeeEye

Originally posted by Radiobuzz
and yet you choose to believe the OP is deliberately trying to fool us, thus making an accusation which is based only on your interpretations of events and not in actual facts.

I'm curious how you are aware of the actual facts when the whole thing is a couple of pictures of dead foxes and a spoken story.

[edit on 30-10-2009 by EsSeeEye]

What? I don't know what the actual facts are, but I know that the OP making a hoax is not an actual fact. Why? Because it hasn't been proven and there's no evidence to do so. The pictures are nothing but pictures showing dead animals and you can't establish that the OP killed them.

For the record, I'm on the skeptical side too and I don't think the foxes were killed by aliens, I'm just saying that it's pretty unfair to mark the OP as a murderer and a hoaxer when it's only based on speculation.