posted on Oct, 30 2009 @ 10:06 PM
reply to post by bsbray11
I read the entire book, you read an online summary of it.
And yet you concede to the possibility that this particular issue may have slipped your memory as you were more concerned with the technical aspects
of the book.
I already said I am not that familiar with the subject of acupuncture.
I'm well aware of that statement, but I wasn't asking of your personal knowledge of the subject. Instead, I was asking about the topic as it was
discussed in the first chapter of the book. In which, again, you conceded to the fact that it may have slipped your memory.
You're not interested in it, you're interested in an argument to feed your ego. You get a endorphin buzz arguing with people online. If you
were actually interested you'd go look up whatever it is that's bothering you instead of pestering me about it when I've made it clear several
times now I neither know much about the subject
What a presumptuous way to misrepresent what I've been arguing this entire time. Hell, it's the whole basis for the topic of the thread. Let's go
over the argument again. I am simply against people misusing or using a misunderstanding of science in an attempt to "prove" their assumptions
without any further evidences for those assumptions and I am against using assumptions to prove assumptions as that is more of an exercise in
stupidity and futility.
nor particularly care to listen to you rant on about it when you are obviously extremely biased.
Ah, so now we're going to claim that in light of Tiller *which again I would like to point out that you concede to the possibility this slipped your
memory*, is blatantly wrong about the weak electromagnetic force, that his own fault of one aspect of science now make's it a wrongful bias towards
the rest of his work.
So, I'm just some big mean biased bad guy and Tiller is still such a wonderful man who has it all right? OH BALONEY!
By the way, how is that power of intent working out for you? I noticed you still failed to refute the three points I raised. I'm sure there is a real
good reason or argument coming. Or are you going to keep up with the verbalized bowel movements? I just love a good crap show!
[EDIT TO ADD]
Actually, now that I think about it, maybe there is something to this. I've been so positively intent that you would be unable to reasonably answer
my queries and hell... here we have it folks, PROOF IT WORKS!
[edit on 30-10-2009 by sirnex]