It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NASA "Moon Bombing" mission -- DISAPPEARS

page: 31
71
<< 28  29  30    32  33  34 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 09:50 PM
link   
reply to post by RiotComing
 


Hi RiotComing,

I did catch the last half hour of the show, it was on from 2:00pm to 5:00pm est......

And I did hear him say that the 'bomb' was 'pulled in' by a tractor beam by benevolent et's and made a soft landing...he said, stay tuned, more to come....

Rumor Mill News does have an archive but that site is so hard to navigate, I can't figure it out..


[edit on 10-10-2009 by rainfall]

[edit on 10-10-2009 by rainfall]




posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 09:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Starsburnfyre
 


It's only 'odd' because you refuse to research - and opt for validation on a thread full of fantasy prone conspiracy theorists who are suspicious of their own shadow.

There is nothing odd about the moon. I saw it a few hours ago ok! Take it or leave it!

IRM

[edit on 10/10/09 by InfaRedMan]



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 09:55 PM
link   
Hi guys!

Since the day of the crazy moon bombing, I've come up with some questions. There are things that just doesn't seem logic to me about what i saw that day. I saw the live feed from NASA's own website, and some of the first things that struck my mind while observing was:


1) Why did I see just a few guys filled with equipment in a tiny room, smaller than a average sized classrom? It just seemed odd to me to use a small room like that for such a huge event.


2) Why did it appear to be a still image of the moon surface on the live feed? (at least, that was my first thought)


3) Why did they start zooming in on the apparently still image, updating only every 2-3 seconds? I first thought it was some kind of cheap computer simulation showing before the actual event, and I actually waited for them to switch over to a real live camera before it all started.


4) If the mission price was incredible $79 millions, why didn't they put in just a little extra to get a better camera? I think $500.000 extra for a camera should have done the job. This event was a historic event, so it should have been well documented.


5) Did NASA only see what we saw in Low Res? Or did they have better equipment with HD quality for own use? And if so, why not showing to us?


6) Why didn't I see any impact at all? At least I expect to see something happened to the moon surface in near future.


7) How did they manage to make the sattelite appear to stand still over the target area before descending? The moon has gravity, and even if it's less than earth, anything orbiting it would need some speed to stay in orbit. The moon doesn't even rotate around itself.


8) Shouldn't we see any ground movement at all? (like we see when the space shuttle is filming down on earth)


9) Was this event staged by NASA/ Military/ Elite to test our reaction?
I really don't think they were looking for water.


10) Am I missing something here?



Thanks!



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 09:56 PM
link   
reply to post by rainfall
 


I just finished listening to Coast to Coast AM w/Richard C from the 6th.

Richard implied that the impact would result in something visible with the naked eye.

It'll be interesting to hear him explain why he was so wrong next time he's on the show! lol



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 10:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Duvant
 


no crapola man, my thoughts exactly why did it seem super weird and somewhat fake/staged..... 79 million? c'mon and that's all you have to show for it. why can't we stop being F'd wiiith!?



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 10:03 PM
link   
reply to post by InfaRedMan
 


You're just rude. wow! I never said they destroyed it hun. I said that it's odd I haven't seen it. And asked if anyone else has. So fine...you've seen it. congratulations! That's all I wanted to know. I'll remember to never express my concern on this site ever again. ciao!



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 10:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Starsburnfyre
 


Don't leave!!!! We all get burned sometime!!! Just chalk it up as experience and keep posting. It is how we all learn here.



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 10:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Starsburnfyre
 


I'm being real... not rude. Here's a website with a simple program that will allow you to find planets etc in real time. A quick search of the internet would have provided you the piece of mind you required. I wouldn't expect as much from some of the members currently posting their conspiracies in this thread. I understand you are new but there are people here that are crazy enough to tell you the moon is a holographic projection... or an alien spacecraft.. etc etc...

I hope you understand where I'm coming from here...

Planet Finder

IRM


[edit on 10/10/09 by InfaRedMan]



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 10:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Starsburnfyre
reply to post by InfaRedMan
 


You're just rude. wow! I never said they destroyed it hun. I said that it's odd I haven't seen it. And asked if anyone else has. So fine...you've seen it. congratulations! That's all I wanted to know. I'll remember to never express my concern on this site ever again. ciao!



Just put him on ignore.

You are not the first to be treated in such a manner by this individual.

Don't let him drive you off. (That may even have been his intention)

*We are not all so unkind.



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 11:02 PM
link   
reply to post by InfaRedMan
 


Hi InfaRedMan,

With an avatar like you have I am surprised you are calling anybody crazy for saying that the moon is an 'artificial hollow satellite.'

Maybe YOU need to do some research before you voice your opinion and make yourself look like a fool...ii


Hope this will help you grow..



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 11:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Exuberant1
 


Yeah E1... so terrible I even took the time to supply him/her with a link to a planet finder. BTW... My communications with you on threads have always be more than cordial thank you.

If I came across rude, my apologies to them.. but it's wasn't my intention.

IRM



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 11:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by rainfall
reply to post by InfaRedMan
 


Hi InfaRedMan,

With an avatar like you have I am surprised you are calling anybody crazy for saying that the moon is an 'artificial hollow satellite.'


I called nobody crazy. That's your own internal dialog at work... not mine. My avatar has little to do with anything. You give it more significance that it's worth... nor do I follow your logic It's just a picture! Relax!


Maybe YOU need to do some research before you voice your opinion and make yourself look like a fool...ii



Because I don't think the moon is an artificial satellite, I am a fool?

Hehehe! Cheers!

IRM


[edit on 10/10/09 by InfaRedMan]



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 11:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by rainfall
reply to post by RiotComing
 


Hi RiotComing,

I did catch the last half hour of the show, it was on from 2:00pm to 5:00pm est......

And I did hear him say that the 'bomb' was 'pulled in' by a tractor beam by benevolent et's and made a soft landing...he said, stay tuned, more to come....


Ooooh that sounds very interesting!
Speaking of which, I had a work colleague with me on Friday, discussing the moon bombing and the possibilities and reasons for it taking place. He believed there is indeed a colony of ET on the moon and they could possibly try to stop the event. This is a guy who started working with us only a few days ago and we got on the subject of ET / UFOs and he has had experiences as a contactee - and all of us around the smoko table listened to him openly, not as a nut. He doesn't sound like the kind of guy who would lie about these things, especially to a bunch of new people trying to fit in with as far as a new job goes.

He sounds very clued up when it comes to benevolent ET, and when the report came in that the bombing mission had indeed mysteriously come to a halt, my first thought was of the conversation we were having with the new workmate the day before. I had never met a real contactee in the flesh before, and I look forward to what he is going to say about this on Monday. The poor guy lost his first marriage because of his experiences (she was fearful more than anything, according to him), but his second wife is more understanding and open-minded - as are most of us at the smoko table!

There is definitely a change in the air, less of us are accepting what NASA have to say on these matters. I would not consider my workmates to be 'conspiracy theorists' - we are just your average joes working all day at a meat processing plant.

Can't wait to hear more about what Richard Hoagland has to say. Interestingly, my new workmate also knows a lot about Mars and the Nazi stuff - the same subjects Mr Hoagland specialises in.

[edit on 10-10-2009 by RiotComing]



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 11:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by InfaRedMan
reply to post by Starsburnfyre
 

I understand you are new but there are people here that are crazy enough to tell you the moon is a holographic projection... or an alien spacecraft.. etc etc...


Can you say 'hypocrite'...


PEACE and LOVE...



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 11:39 PM
link   
The previous moon, prior to this our very nice one for some unknown reason broke up and pieces of it impacted the eastern usa hence all the impact craters over 1000, then somehow we re-aquired our present moon, perhaps history repeats itself? perhaps our ancestors were trying to blow up the moon too! Something is very very wrong when the president of a country the only country that has used nuclear weapons on a civilian population and whose main purpose of most of the nuclear reactors is not about producing power but weapons grade depleted uranium gets the nobel peace prize,,excuse me..on the eve of bombing the moon? those that are running the show are totally mad, what kind of meds are they on? Obama increased the troop levels in afganistan, has not pulled the troops out of Iraq..How did this happen? Madness the PTB are MAD, inbred, and insane, sorry i'm out of line, but this edward teller mad scientist stuff will kill us all if something else doesn't. MY bet is that the moon dwellers were ready and prepped, standing there with a big catch net, or just used their psychic abilities to slow the impactor down, after all, home is home.



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 12:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by voodmon
The previous moon, prior to this our very nice one for some unknown reason broke up and pieces of it impacted the eastern usa hence all the impact craters over 1000, then somehow we re-aquired our present moon, perhaps history repeats itself?


Wow, this was something else my workmate said in our lunch hour on Friday - that his ET contact told him that our previous moon was smashed to pieces and our new moon was towed here. I don't know what to make of that theory, but heck, I'm all ears nevertheless!



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 12:19 AM
link   
reply to post by voodmon
 


voodmon,

I think the only reason the nobel peace prize was given to Obama on friday was to divert the attention away from the NASA-non event!

Also, voodmon, did you know that there once was a time that there were two satellites orbiting the earth??

One day we will all look back on this 'earth experiment' and have a big laugh...



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 12:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by InfaRedMan
reply to post by Starsburnfyre
 


I'm being real... not rude. Here's a website with a simple program that will allow you to find planets etc in real time. A quick search of the internet would have provided you the piece of mind you required. I wouldn't expect as much from some of the members currently posting their conspiracies in this thread. I understand you are new but there are people here that are crazy enough to tell you the moon is a holographic projection... or an alien spacecraft.. etc etc...

I hope you understand where I'm coming from here...

Planet Finder

IRM


[edit on 10/10/09 by InfaRedMan]


But wait, there's more! How about John Lear claiming that the moon was towed into its current orbit by a huge electromagnetic vehicle, and that vehicle can be seen in a photo taken of the moon crater Tsiolkovsky. He also believes that the moon contains a breathable atmosphere, as evidenced by photos showing smoke or vapor coming from the surface.



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 12:38 AM
link   
Thats interesting....

Mod Note: One Line Post – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 10/11/2009 by semperfortis]



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 12:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by Skeptical Ed

But wait, there's more! How about John Lear claiming that the moon was towed into its current orbit by a huge electromagnetic vehicle, and that vehicle can be seen in a photo taken of the moon crater Tsiolkovsky. He also believes that the moon contains a breathable atmosphere, as evidenced by photos showing smoke or vapor coming from the surface.


Yeah,

And your point is.....?



new topics

top topics



 
71
<< 28  29  30    32  33  34 >>

log in

join