reply to post by alyosha1981
maybe yes, maybe no. In the 1920's they averaged 600 banks a year going bankrupt.
This time, we have the "to big to fail" banks that have been bailed out
in the 1930's the concept of selling the amount of debt as we have since 2007 was inconceivable!!
It was as early as 1928 when the construction boom ended, and it was 5 years later before the worst of the Depression hit. It was 1929 when business
inventories grew three times larger than the year before. Public consumption was markedly down.
Automobile sales declined by a third in the nine months before the crash. Why do you think we just has a C4C program? To stop a repeat of the same
numbers. Freight carloads and manufacturing also fell in 1929.
Looking at the Dow or S&P500 today to be an indicator of how the economy is is the wrong thesis. IN the late 1920's and the 30's it was the correct
thing to monitor, but today, we have so much market manipulation occurring that it is not "safe" to use the stock market as an economic gage.
Sure, in 2007 we had a severe decline, and we will probably have another one in the future. But to use that & that alone as the indicator of whether
things are better or worse than in the Great Depression is an exercise in mental masturbation. You can keep felling good, if you only rub the right
spots.
Edit to add:
Also, a HUGE factor... in the 1930's the US Dollar was still on the gold standard. It was impossible for the .gov to simply create $$ out of thin
air, like they can now. This severely limited the gov response to the failures and crash.
Now, that isn't the case, our $$ is pure fiat $$, and all it takes is a few key strokes on a computer to create more & continue to bailout or
backdoor fund whatever needs to be kept looking good.
But eventually, the US Dollar will have to face the decline in value that this manipulation creates, and when that day comes, all bets on things are
not so bad are off.
[edit on 10/5/09 by redhatty]