What US State Would You Choose?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 25-9-2009 @ 01:18 AM by whitewave
Originally posted by getreadyalready
I would have said Texas, but it is a little iffy right now, so I will go with Oklahoma! It is like Texas-Lite! Plus you have the Indian Reservations as sovereign land, and you have a lot of caves and lakes.


Texas-lite?! That's funny!

We've got plenty of flat, treeless land so you don't have to worry about people sneaking up on you. There's no trees to block your view.

The place smells like cow dung so nobody wants to sneak up on you anyway.

The dustbowl was just a fluke and all the people driven insane by the constant swirling dirt clouds were just sissies.

There's hardly ever any teratagenic, hallucinogenic ergot on the grain fields anymore. By God! we sprayed enough pesticides on that stuff that it wouldn't dare infect the crops anymore.

According to recent articles, we do seem to have a problem naming the first president but Oklahoma wasn't a state back then anyways so who cares, right?

We do have Indian reservations but several Native Americans seem to have escaped and have been seen partying hardy with the cowboys. No one's sure who should be rounded up at this point.

I think the Baptists still tar and feather undesirables so if you decide to come here be sure to thump your bible soundly. If that doesn't work, show them your gun. They're easily distracted by talk of MOA, barrel rifling, etc.

It may be easier to move to Montana or one of those other choice locations. That's it. Keep moving. Off you go.

It's ok now all you Okies. I think they're gone. Anybody up for a trip to the lake or a weekend spelunking?



reply posted on 25-9-2009 @ 05:05 PM by dooper
reply to post by 12GaugePermissionSlip


I would agree with you that overall, not just SHTF scenario, but if one wanted to be in the safest area for every conceivable human disaster/geological disaster, the Four Corners area, including all of northern New Mexico would be ideal.

But if it's strictly a SHTF situation, most states have rural areas to go to, and I sincerely believe that the absolute worst places to be would be in the larger cities.

All those people in such a confined area with very limited resources.


reply posted on 30-9-2009 @ 03:14 PM by grover
reply to post by serendipitynow



Maine. Pure and simple. A lot of wilderness...low population...educated and open minded...great cultural life and food...viscious winters though.


reply posted on 30-9-2009 @ 04:41 PM by DaMod
reply to post by Miraj



I live in Wyoming and it is a very nice place to live actually. Lots of fishing and hunting available as well as cover and the prevailing winds pretty well keep southwestern Wyoming well protected from nuclear fallout. I really like it here. There are places I've been in this state that if you didn't know any better you would swear you where in Alaska.

There are however much desert area in the state. If you prefer trees I would recommend northern Wyoming (mostly forested) or south western Wyoming because there is always national forest within close proximity (even if where you live is high desert)

Hope that helps.

[edit on 30-9-2009 by DaMod]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Amazing French Indigo Girl in Africa (Tippi)
  Posted 2 days ago with 60 member flags
My Dad is on the NatGEO "Doomsday Preppers". And I\'m proud of him!
  Posted 11 days ago with 54 member flags
Hello again preppers and survivalist. Life changing reality.
  Posted 12 days ago with 31 member flags
Hobby or Second Income Homemade Soaps, Sundry, and Remedy Recipes
  Posted 18 days ago with 20 member flags
NATGEO Doomsday Prepper has guns taken away. Judged incompetent.
  Posted 3 days ago with 14 member flags
Do Not Drink From The Tap!
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags