It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lpowell0627
Why is it in these threads that everything that doesn't fit said prediction, is simply overlooked and ignored?
For example, if Iran is so innocent, can you please tell me how they managed to build a facility too small to actually be used for energy purposes?
VIENNA — Iran's recently revealed uranium enrichment hall is a highly fortified underground space that appears too small to house a civilian nuclear program, but large enough to serve for military activities, diplomats said Thursday.
Iran began building the facility near the holy city of Qom seven years ago, and after bouts of fitful construction could finish the project in a year, the diplomats said.
Both the construction timeline and the size of the facility — inspected last month by the International Atomic Energy Agency — are significant in helping shed light on Tehran's true nuclear intentions.
Iran says it wants to enrich only to make atomic fuel for energy production, but the West fears it could retool its program to churn out fissile warhead material.
One of the diplomats — a senior official from a European nation — said Thursday that the enrichment hall is too small to house the tens of thousands of centrifuges needed for peaceful industrial nuclear enrichment, but is the right size to contain the few thousand advanced machines that could generate the amount of weapons-grade uranium needed to make nuclear warheads.
Originally posted by Dzlr40
2012- My Theory
Without a doubt, the worst movie i have ever seen!
complete and utter garbage.
Originally posted by Lavey2
even though NO ONE is paying attention....
I've got a direct uplink to the GCN right now, and something big is going to happen today.
Originally posted by JRSB
Hi interesting thread Lavey. First off I can point out a few contradictions specifically based on your beliefs, however you have asked that this thread not be a debate on religion and I can tell your opinion has changed over the course of time; as have mine, therefor I will not hold that against you. Though if you like we can discuss this.