reply to post by TrickoftheShade
Middle eastern. They had the details of who was on the plane. From that and the samples gained from the cars and motel rooms they were able to
match up to the found dna.
How did they get the detail of who was on the plane when their identities were stolen?
Again to whom was the FBI matching their DNA to?
You have failed to answer this question through all my posts.
Bingo. Same argument used to such lack of effect by Lilydale months ago. All you're saying is that you don't believe it's possible to
extract dna from plane crashes like this. But every piece of evidence says that you're wrong. All you have is your personal incredulity,
Oh you mean parts of the engine, perhaps the hijackers drooled all over the outside of these alleged airplanes we all know the inside were vaporized
yet you believe the hijackers either spit or drooled on the outside of the airplanes just so the FBI could collect their DNA and match to who again?
You are not thinking logically.
According to the FBI the alleged hijacker who rented the rental car were using stolen identities. So again I will ask you to whom were the FBI
matching their DNA to?
And I'm not going to spend valuable time showing you how dna extraction works.
I believe most people know how DNA extraction works, so you are not wasting your time
That's my point - you can't ask people to satisfy questions based on your own ignorance.
What ignorance? Please enlighten me?
You have to go out there and learn why you're wrong, not just sit on your arse shouting about how the whole thing is a conspiracy unless your
baseless convictions are proved wrong.
You mean me asking critical questions to how the FBI magically sift through millions of tons of ash and concrete for the hijackers DNA when the FBI
could not identify over 15 hundred missing bodies at the WTC through DNA. You keep repeating the OS repeatedly for your answers, and your answers do
not stand up to simple logic. I will continue to ask you to whom were the FBI matching their alleged DNA that you claim they found through sifting
through millions of tons of WTC debris with their super-duper DNA magic machine.
“He may be”? What harms the OS was the fact the FBI failed miserable to tell the truth and the only physical evidence that was produce were
things that anyone could have planted. The FBI were never able to prove who the hijacker really were, that is why seven of these 19 alleged hijackers
are alive and free today according to our own government, interesting isn’t it
Suicide Hijackers Identified by the FBI Proclaim Their Innocence
At Least 7 of the 9/11
Hijackers are Still Alive
7 Of 19 'Hijackers' Alive After
911 - New OBL Video A Phoney
*Your say this is total nonsense,* then you prove this is all a lie. We are here to support the facts and dig for more facts, not to stick our heads
in the sand and wallow in ignorance and denial.
Speaking of people sitting on our rears sitting on a computer shouting everything is a conspiracy as you claim, I find it ironic that you have spent
five years shouting in most 911 threads that the OS is true and there is no conspiracy into 911, yet you sit on a conspiracy website have invested a
tremendous amount of time proving what? Have you convince most people the OS is all true? My opinion is no.
And the evidence was planted? How?
There is information involving hundreds of individuals in the dna supply chain and its subsequent study. I doubt they're all in on it.
That is your opinion; none of this information has ever been publicized to the public. So are you now insisting that you are an FBI agent who has
inside information now?
Rule # 6 in the art of disinformation: When all else fails, attack and ridicule the messenger
Rule number one when trying to persuade people of your frankly outlandish claims: learn some basic grammar and spelling if you want to be taken
The fact is you mean like supporting the proven lies of the OS fairytales, talking down to anyone who dares to question you, or the OS lies and when
all fails insult the messenger because you can’t worm yourself out of the hole you dug for yourself.
You have failed to answer most of my questions and the fact is you have not produce a single source to back up your silly claims.
You're the one who thinks that you can't get DNA from a plane crash. That hundreds of officials and scientists are lying to cover up fake DNA
testing. I think it's kind of up to you to produce evidence.
I have never made any such claim, now look who is making up outlandish fallacies.
We are not here to support a proven fairytale, don’t you agree?
The big problem for you is of course that there isn't any.
Now look who has just contradicted themselves you say there is no evidence, so you cling to a fairytale where FBI have a magic wand and can created
evidence out of thin air.
Your only argument is that "the government lies so this must be a lie".
Your only augment is the government never lies.
Hilariously you then produce an instance where you think the government is telling the truth. You've debunked your own logic. Well
Hilariously enough you have demonstrated that the government can not tell lies and everything they say is the holy grail of truth.
You have proved nothing in supporting the OS or the OP to where the DNA came from.