It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In New York, efforts to identify the terrorists were more difficult. There were still too many victims who had not been identified by their DNA, making it impossible to flag the terrorists by a process of elimination. The scientists needed the DNA profiles from the hijackers. Shaler's office turned to the FBI for help. The request made its way to the desk of Alan Giusti, the lab's forensic examiner in charge of the September 11 investigation. As it turned out, Giusti had worked for Shaler at a private DNA lab in the '80s, when the technology was in its infancy. Now Giusti was spending his days using genetic clues to nail bank robbers and murderers.
Working with a team of specialists on the third floor of the J. Edgar Hoover building in Washington, D.C., Giusti was in fact already creating DNA profiles of the New York terrorists from scraps of evidence left behind in hotel rooms and rental cars in the days before the attacks. A large basement room in the FBI building was filled with boxes of evidence, each piece stored in a brown paper bag. "It looks low tech," says Giusti, but the bags keep out humidity or dryness—"the two demons of DNA analysis." For DNA sleuths used to working with tiny scraps of genetic material, it was the mother lode: "fingernail clippings, chewing gum, hairbrushes, anything we could get dead skin off of," he says. When they swabbed the "friction areas" along the inside collars of shirts, the DNA came back mixed, an indication that the hijackers may have shared clothes. A few pieces of used tissue, tossed into a hotel room wastebasket, yielded clues, as did saliva from cigarette butts. Giusti mixed them with enzymes to release DNA—"like cracking the nut of a shell to get the meat out," he says. The "amplified" product—a few drops of clear, viscous liquid—was then put into a large machine that spits out lists of numbers, a genetic map unique to each individual.
It took more than a year for Giusti's lab to get back to New York with the results—a single page with 10 genetic codes. It was February 2003, and Shaler and his crew got to work on the numbers immediately. They were anxious to see if they could make a match to any of the unidentified remains they had retrieved. Shaler's deputy, Howard Baum, thought it would never work. How could they be sure that the clothing and tissues and cigarette butts were really those of the hijackers? "We had no idea where the profiles came from or how they were developed," says Baum. "I was skeptical." A scientist entered the codes into the lab's Mass Fatality Identification System. They told the computer to display any matches to the hijacker profiles in red. Immediately, there were two matches. Shaler and Baum were elated—they would be able to weed out at least some of the terrorists' remains after all. "Finding the first match was the big deal," says Baum. "It was proof of the concept—that we could identify the hijackers. Our job was not for the dead, it was for the living."
Originally posted by thedman
I suggest everyone read it
But that would be against the "Truther code".....
www.newsweek.com...
Originally posted by thedman
It took more than a year for Giusti's lab to get back to New York with the results—a single page with 10 genetic codes. It was February 2003, and Shaler and his crew got to work on the numbers immediately. They were anxious to see if they could make a match to any of the unidentified remains they had retrieved.
Apparently have problem with reading comprehension....
Article states that reason was to see if hijackers remains could be
identified from DNA material collected
Families did not want their relatives remains "contaminated" by the
Hijackers
Also was means of positive confirmation of the hijackers considering all the truthers yapping about how the hijackers were still alive
Positive confirmation of hijacker idenities...
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by Lillydale
Apparently have problem with reading comprehension....
Article states that reason was to see if hijackers remains could be
identified from DNA material collected
Families did not want their relatives remains "contaminated" by the
hijackers
Also was means of positive confirmation of the hijackers considering all the truthers yapping about how the hijackers were still alive
Positive confirmation of hijacker idenities...
Originally posted by impressme
Oh well, I guess that just blew your OS hijacker DNA fantasy to a oblivion.
Oh well, I guess that just blew your OS hijacker DNA fantasy to a oblivion.
I really do not understand why the FBI does not just come to ATS where posters here have all the answers they do not know how to get.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Lillydale
Well, actually, the most rudimentary "research" (google) will give you the answers you seek. DNA was collected at Shanksville, whatever didn't match victims was assumed to be the DNA of the hijackers. At the WTC, DNA bearing material was collected from the personal belongings of the hijackers and matches were found. Pentagon was approached the same as Shanksville. No big mystery. Like I said simple, basic logical process.
Really don't understand all the "confusion".
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Lillydale
Where exactly are you reading all this OS?? What is the source of your OS material - other conspiracy websites?
Really, it is not very complicated. In NYC they gathered all human remains that they could and profiled the DNA. They had DNA bearing material from the hijackers personal belongings, they found matches for three of the hijackers.
At shanksville they had DNA from all the human remains whatever didn't match the victims was then identified as the hijackers, same in DC.
You should check your OS sources a little more carefully.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Lillydale
Where exactly are you reading all this OS?? What is the source of your OS material - other conspiracy websites?
President George W. Bush.
V.P. Dick Cheney
S.O.D. Donald Rumsfeld.
These would be the officials that gave me my official story. If you need more detail, try reading releases from the FBI, CIA, DHS, etc. These things would also be considered official documents.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Lillydale
Where exactly are you reading all this OS?? What is the source of your OS material - other conspiracy websites?
President George W. Bush.
V.P. Dick Cheney
S.O.D. Donald Rumsfeld.
These would be the officials that gave me my official story. If you need more detail, try reading releases from the FBI, CIA, DHS, etc. These things would also be considered official documents.
Really, it is not very complicated. In NYC they gathered all human remains that they could and profiled the DNA. They had DNA bearing material from the hijackers personal belongings, they found matches for three of the hijackers.
Really? From where? What is your source? Some OS website?
At shanksville they had DNA from all the human remains whatever didn't match the victims was then identified as the hijackers, same in DC.
You should check your OS sources a little more carefully.
I did not realize that I ever even mentioned shanksville. The coroner claims there were no remains to sift through in which to find any DNA but I am sure he is no official to you.
Where do you get your info? FOX News? Your claim that they found DNA from 3 hijackers is yet another contradiction. Lets add that to these OS stories that they found all their DNA, they got DNA from relatives, and now, it was just 3 of them identified by rental car dust. OK!
Originally posted by hooper
Really? The why did you not quote GW Bush with regard to the DNA? When did he talk about it? Where? In what context?
Rental car dust? Just making crap up now, aren't you. Pretty desperate.
Any modern adult knows that you don't need an entire human body in order to extract DNA. That's the whole idea - the DNA of the specimen is found in every cell of the specimen.
When and where did the coroner at Shanksville ever claim that there were insufficient human remains from which to extract and profile DNA, or is this just more BS you're pulling out of thin air to deflect from the reality that you have absolutely no argument.?
“If you didn’t know, you would have thought no one was on the plane. You would have thought they dropped them off somewhere.” [Longman, 2002, pp. 217] The only recognizable body part he sees is a piece of spinal cord with five vertebrae attached. He will later tell Australian newspaper The Age, “I’ve seen a lot of highway fatalities where there’s fragmentation. The interesting thing about this particular case is that I haven’t, to this day, 11 months later, seen any single drop of blood. Not a drop.”
Wally Miller, the coroner at Shanksville said he found no blood, but found human remains. When pushed on the question of finding human remains, Miller said...Yes/No/Some....and then said that the only remains found were hands and feet - nothing else.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Ah...magically body parts turn up. Are they one that make any sense in context of the crash? No. Do they serve to give off the idea that the people supposed to be on that plane were on that plane? Sure. Hands and feet. They ended up finding hands and feet. No blood. No torsos. No heads. Just hands and feet. For a crash that completely demolished that plane full of people that were supposedly in different places as a mutiny was mounted, it sure did a nice job of saving everyone's hands and feet.
Wally Miller, the coroner at Shanksville said he found no blood, but found human remains. When pushed on the question of finding human remains, Miller said...Yes/No/Some....and then said that the only remains found were hands and feet - nothing else.
[edit on 12/21/09 by Lillydale]
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Lillydale
You do realize of course, that you don't need any specific body part in order to extract DNA, correct? You don't need blood or whole parts, just indivdual cells. DNA has been extracted from the dry saliva on the end