okay i have to say... this got my attention... 60 percent of ats believe this is real, 15 percent say its false hes a nut, and the other 25 dont know what to believe....
So I am leaning towards believing this, the evidence is interesting yet not enough. I want to believe this, in part because it would substanciate alot
of things said on ats.
We need more information, not only on this doctor but on these claims of conections to mass media...I haven't heard anything about this before I came
to the site tonight.
My point being, say this guy is a loon, and everything hes saying is false and said for the sake of publicity, alright he wouldnt be the first. How
much does he really stand to gain, minor increase in sales, for now until he is disclaimed, then all of his work would be for naught, his career would
be over mostly.
Now say he is right completly and all he is saying is true, he would gain huge sales, fame and trust from the general public.
If he is partially truthful/mistaken he will gain some fame and some increased sales. Half the people would still thinks hes crazy, and the other half
would hold onto his extra claims.
The real problem I see, and it is IMMEDIATE, is that if he is right, and the media is involved, I think, they would just have to withhold the
information long enough for a goo amount of the population to willingly/forcfully get injected. then they succeed by default.
To quote the modern day savant Homer J. Simpson "De fault the best two words in the english language" ~~~at least if you stand to acheive your
P.S. In poker you dont play your cards, you play the player, and these players are big time. I would start thinking of looking down the line of
"Where does this all lead, who stands to gain, and what is 'their' next move?" look down the line... the only weapon we have is information and
knowledge. If you control the information and the release of it, you control the masses.