posted on Sep, 17 2009 @ 11:49 PM
Obviously they will do an end around through Saudi airspace Um, they already gave permission for this. No, I have no link. I read it on ATS and so it
must be true. lol.
I wonder sometimes about Israel. The Lebanon War in 2006. The Gaza crap earlier this year. If Israel was set upon destruction and genocide, I can oly
say, oops. They are a failure Not even in my opinion.
A soldier was kidnapped and we had the latest Lebanon war.
Rockets, that hurt mostly nothing caused the Gaze excursion.
Oh they look so weak, while expending so much.
It's a ruse, folks,
It's experimental, It's how far we can push for a single guard. It's how far can we push for a few rockets that actually killed or injured people.
It's let's try out some of these arms and practice destroying infrastructure.
Come on folks. Israel could decimate Gaza. They could create a no man's land out of Lebanon. But they can't decimate Iran, without the help of
bigger countries. U.S.A., Russia and Saudi Arabia. US has always been on board. Saudi Arabia has been on board a long time.They are the dominant Arab
country in the region. And now, Netanyahoooo visited Russia, and the US suddenly decides long range missle defences are no longer a threat to
northern Europe. Now we just need short and medium range missle defenses. Where are those going to be placed?
I'm just saying. I'm sure others who are more intellgent and have more perseverence than me can straighten out these ideas I have been ramblng on
Meanwhile.............Israel, backed up by U.S. might, not a win situation.
Risk. A fun game. A successful Australia Sitter is good. But, I have found out that eventually, control of the mideast, while requriing great strength
and fortitude, wins the game. But, when you toss into the mix, like the European game rules, it is much more difficult and requires trust and
alliances. Oh, how real world this is! It's been a long time since I played Risk, but I'd like to see a nuclear option. Just for fun, you know.