|
|
Topic started on 17-9-2009 @ 08:35 AM by Haydn_17
|
 
Europe- Population 803,850,858
USA- Population 304,059,724
Lets say a war breaks out between Europe and America like the game Endwar.
European Forces.
Active Service Personnel
2,281,700
Reserve Force
6,166,560
Total
9,359,832
Tanks
12,687 Not including other armoured veichcles
Jets
4,144
Transport aircraft
1,682
Budget of all countries combined
284,968,240,000
USA
Total Active
1,445,000 Not including enlisted, officer, females.
Reserve Force
850,000 ^^
29,900 armored vehicles
Cant find jets!
Spent on military
Budget $651 billion
time to rant people!
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Weaponry topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 08:56 AM by mopusvindictus
|
Crap Navy compared to ours... little ability to field troops on our soil, facing a fully armed populace as well. Europe has a larger combined military
but not truely under one leadership and the chaos of having armed American forces already on their soil to cause havoc, genuinely united under one
leadership with nukes in theater
If that is over come, we launch thousands of Nukes...
There are no real wars anymore
Police actions and Armageddon scenarios
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 09:05 AM by mikerussellus
|
      
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 09:17 AM by peacepeople
|

Europe without a doubt
nah lets hope this never happens. in this case this thread will get responses of not who would win but who the people of ATS want to win and its
mainly americans here so..
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 09:19 AM by mblahnikluver
|
Well you are putting an entire continent against a single country.....The numbers of course will be higher for Europe  since its a continent with
many countries in it. I think anyone could win, depends on many factors.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 09:26 AM by Remixtup
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 09:29 AM by revdrdrsunshine
|
Remember, the USA ALWAYS goes hand in hand with Israel and the UK... so they got that goin i guess....
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 09:58 AM by INQUISITION11
|
Europe could be the ultimate superpower if it got it's act together.Whether that's what we want is another matter.Britain is naturally closer to the
English speaking world.Most European nations are generally none aggressive.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 10:03 AM by j04j07e71
|
    
I think you will find that us Brits are part of Europe, that taken into account and the fact that our armed forces are the best in the world! period!
combine that with the rest of Europe then I think you will find that the good ole USA gets their bottom smacked. unless of course you wanna go
nuclear!!!!
then you win.  
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 11:45 AM by LetTheTruthBeTold
|
Hmmm... It's tough to say. I'd probably have to give it to the US though. It would be a long, deadly, devastating war - the worst in human history.
It would probably dwarf World War II. But, in the end, I think America would win. America has a much higher military budget (like 49% of all
world military spending!), and so they have a much larger arsenal (weapons, naval fleet, air force, etc.). The technology in America is cutting
edge, and although Europe is right up there too, I believe the US is a little bit ahead of them in military technology. Europe does have more troops
in service though, so they have an edge in personel.
The main reason I believe America would ultimately win, though, is because of the US citizens. Every single citizen would become a soldier if invaded,
and would fight and defend themselves and their country until they die. So the 300,000,000+ figure you gave for the US might actually be pretty close
to representing those who would fight (as militia), and would give the American armed forces an insurmountable advantage. No enemy would be able to
gain too much ground on US soil, because they'd be fighting guerillas on a scale of nothing ever seen before. American citizens are allowed to be
armed, and there are well over 300 million firearms owned by US citizens. Many of the European nations have very strict gun laws, on the other hand,
so a civilian resistance would be much smaller in comparison to one in the US. For this reason, I give the victory at the end to America.
This is provided no nuclear weapons, or highly advanced black projects we do not know about, are used. This would change everything, and most likely
there wouldn't be a winner. Only mutually-assured destruction. We'd all be dead...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 12:07 PM by Ophiuchus 13
|
Then the Invasion will begin, for they who arent nice are waiting for humanity to slip into this form of war.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 12:11 PM by Ophiuchus 13
|
reply to post by mopusvindictus
Nice avatar you have a NICE STAR OF METATRON THE SUPER ARCH ANGEL IN IT, I like.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 12:25 PM by Annav
|
 
There are no winners in war!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 12:40 PM by DaMod
|
reply to post by j04j07e71
It's comparable really. When you talk about special operations units like the SAS, SBS etc. for Britan or the Navy Seals, Army Rangers, etc. for US
you will probably find that the training is of comparable efficiency and tactical knowledge not to mention combat training. As much as some Brits hate
America we are still allies after all, no need to bicker over it.
As far as special technologies go, I think the US probably has Europe beat. We tend to horde awesome weapons of power for later use. Personally I
don't think any country on earth is dumb enough to launch a nuclear weapon. I'm sure we all agree that it would be literal suicide to do so. As far
as the US launching a nuke, well, I don't think we would need to.(I think the next nuke will be by some terrorist organization, and not necessarily
middle eastern.) We usually kill far more than we loose, plus our Marine corp is trained to the level of special forces only there is more of them.
The United States is filled with deer hunters. I know you're thinking hick but what you don't realize is that we are raised marksmen. We have a
knack for stalking animals that have a better sense of smell, sight, and hearing than humans plus we can take them down the precision. Basically a
country full of rifle hunters is a country full of snipers.
[edit on 17-9-2009 by DaMod]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 12:51 PM by DaMod
|
reply to post by LetTheTruthBeTold
I agree, and as I already said, Americans are raised marksmen. Most of us have more than just a little experience with firearms. We wouldn't even
have to be trained to shoot. That training has been going on since we where small children. (I know I was 10 when I started shooting) We hunt animals
that have better senses than humans, plus it would be on our own wild vast turf (if invaded). Plus the American people are already heavily armed.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 12:54 PM by Copernicus
|

Only humans can feel proud over being able to kill and threaten as many fellow humans as possible.
We are such a messed up species.
But dont let me get in the way of your debate over which side would kill the most.
[edit on 17-9-2009 by Copernicus]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 01:00 PM by DaMod
|
reply to post by Copernicus
Well, personally, I think wars are a waste of time, but I'm sure you can agree that if attacked one must defend him/herself to the best of their
ability. Mostly what I've been trying to say is that America is more ready to defend themselves than most. I feel sorry for anyone that thinks they
can take us by force. All they would be doing is awakening a sleeping dragon.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 01:13 PM by Haydn_17
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 01:30 PM by spannera
|
 
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to post by Haydn_17
US would win.
We have Chuck Norris.
We have Jason Stratham who's younger and fitter.
Ps And he's a better actor!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2009 @ 02:27 PM by DaMod
|
reply to post by spannera
Jason Stratham v. Chuck Norris. Now that would be something to watch! Love Jason Stratham btw. Freaking awesome actor!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |