Che Guevara - The Racist

page: 4
5
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 14 2009 @ 11:47 AM
link   




posted on Feb, 6 2010 @ 03:23 PM
link   
Well... I think this is the first time I actually see the truth being told and discussed keeping it civilised and all.

This is why I want to offer my deep and biggest, baddest respect I've ever felt I had to give.

I never could understand Ché's iconic portret.
I learned this in school. I've seen on the discovery channel.

There are more examples of people being remmemberd for the wrong reasons.
Maybe I will find them here to.



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 11:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by gusan
You have to be retarded to believe that.
The man fought for liberty of ALL races in Cuba , he even gave his life.
The population in Cuba is mostly of afrikan origin..how does that sound?

"Prefiero morir parado que vivir en rodillas"

Que viva la revolución!


Don't be so dumb:

65.05% is white
10.08% is black
24.86% is mulatto
1% is asian.

And blacks are mostly racist capitalist mcdonalds eating people, so he was right about them, they could never be socialist because it is not in their nature, they love the blingbling to much.



posted on Feb, 10 2010 @ 12:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by mrwiffler
Yes, racism was rampant during the first half of this century. Darwinism was and still is extremely provocative and supportive of racism. You really have to forgive the poor dears, though of course it is not in the least bit acceptable.



Racism is also rampant today, so there is no difference, america even now has a racist mullato in the white house.



posted on May, 7 2010 @ 05:20 PM
link   
"Because of political correctness has just got a post of mine like THAT,
I said not 1racist comment
2 I expressed my veiws with a compared view of openion?
u I used the word respect and toward the USA, but i t was about a Muslim faction mabe moving to a lot very near "ground zero", I didnt say they not be alound I talkled about how weird it was, and the form was exactly zbout that??Pleas somone explain why what i daid was wrong??



posted on May, 7 2010 @ 10:04 PM
link   
Didn't this communist fighter of the evils of capitalism copyright his image so no T-shirt with his image on it could be sold without paying him a royalty?

Funny how this turd butchered so many just to wind up a capitalist in the end.



posted on May, 8 2010 @ 04:07 PM
link   
reply to post by gusan
 


you are wrong. Cuban society was/is very racist. Please GooGle Carlos Moore who has dared to explode the lie. Yes under The Beard they even whipped South African's assin on memorable battle.



posted on May, 8 2010 @ 04:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by gusan
You have to be retarded to believe that.
The man fought for liberty of ALL races in Cuba , he even gave his life.
The population in Cuba is mostly of afrikan origin..how does that sound?

"Prefiero morir parado que vivir en rodillas"

Que viva la revolución!


Thats wrong, the population in Cuba is mostly white, blacks are like 30%, the rest is white.



posted on May, 28 2010 @ 04:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by winterass

Originally posted by gusan
You have to be retarded to believe that.
The man fought for liberty of ALL races in Cuba , he even gave his life.
The population in Cuba is mostly of afrikan origin..how does that sound?

"Prefiero morir parado que vivir en rodillas"

Que viva la revolución!


Don't be so dumb:

65.05% is white
10.08% is black
24.86% is mulatto
1% is asian.

And blacks are mostly racist capitalist mcdonalds eating people, so he was right about them, they could never be socialist because it is not in their nature, they love the blingbling to much.


Let me get this straight. If your you are half african your mulatto right? So what are you when your asian and white? Wasianatto? Also if europeans mix with native americans why do they call them white? I mean are they not euromericanettos? Did cuba like the americas and the other carribean islands have natives there?

So white+native=white but african + white = mulatto and asian + white = white? Am I missing something?



posted on May, 28 2010 @ 04:16 PM
link   
reply to post by winterass
 


"And blacks are mostly racist capitalist mcdonalds eating people, so he was right about them, they could never be socialist because it is not in their nature, they love the blingbling to much."

i'd say i will have to pull the race card, you sir have made a racist comment, one more comment like thatand the blacks get a free kick at your ###



posted on May, 28 2010 @ 04:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by pieman
before political correctness, casual racism and prejudice were fairly common. i think you'ld be hard pushed to find a public figure you couldn't find some reason to call racist before the 1980's.

ghandi
churchill
roosavelt

pick your favorite and type their name and "racism" into google and you'll probably get results.

that's the way the world was, sexism, racism & homophobia were the norm rather than the exception, even good men held abhorrent beliefs as truth. it shows how far we've come.


Good point there!

I was about to say the same thing, although I don't think it has as much to do with political correctness (which pretty much says: "You can't say that" but not why it's wrong) as opposed to having a lot of barriers knocked down that showed us just how similar we really are. There was a time when I'd meet people that hadn't even seen a black person outside The Cosby Show, but the show itself helped dispel a lot of preconceived notions. The kind we get due to simple ignorance. It's about accessibility.

But yeah...our "heroes" have said and done some pretty crappy real life things.

Take Gandhi for example.

Aside from all of his extra-marital affairs with "virgins", Gandhi also refused to let his wife use penicillin when she was sick, saying rely on God instead, and she died soon afterward.

Guess what happened when he got hit with malaria?

"I'll take some quinine now, please!"

I'm sure Jesus was some radical married guy with kids.

This is why I don't do hero/celebrity/religious figure worship, but I do respect the message they gave.

Take that for what it is.

- Lee



posted on May, 28 2010 @ 04:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by winterass

Originally posted by mrwiffler
Yes, racism was rampant during the first half of this century. Darwinism was and still is extremely provocative and supportive of racism. You really have to forgive the poor dears, though of course it is not in the least bit acceptable.



Racism is also rampant today, so there is no difference, america even now has a racist mullato in the white house.


Glenn Beck?

You still running around saying that "Obama hates White people" nonsense, when he constantly stated how much he loved the hell out of the ones that raised him?

FOX should review your contract for that sort of lunacy.

- Lee



posted on May, 28 2010 @ 05:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by winterass

Originally posted by gusan
You have to be retarded to believe that.
The man fought for liberty of ALL races in Cuba , he even gave his life.
The population in Cuba is mostly of afrikan origin..how does that sound?

"Prefiero morir parado que vivir en rodillas"

Que viva la revolución!


Don't be so dumb:

65.05% is white
10.08% is black
24.86% is mulatto
1% is asian.


Dumb?
Don't break that glass house of yours.


The 2002 census figures supplied by the government claim that 65% of Cubans were white.[1] The Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies at the University of Miami says 68% are black. The Minority Rights Group International says that "An objective assessment of the situation of Afro-Cubans remains problematic due to scant records and a paucity of systematic studies both pre- and post-revolution. Estimates of the percentage of people of African descent in the Cuban population vary enormously, ranging from 33.9 per cent to 62 per cent".[2][3]Wiki


*My emphasis.

The person in your quote also said "African descent" (which would include Mulattos) so I'm going to assume literacy isn't your strong-point and you've clearly never been to Cuba, nor know anyone who has.

I personally can tell you that your numbers are crap, but you probably pulled them from thin air since you aren't even thorough enough to supply a simple source.

Nice work with the "dumb" thing but you should refrain from using it in the future.

- Lee



posted on May, 28 2010 @ 05:25 PM
link   
This terrible 'racist' was a medical doctor who worked as a volunteer for leper colonies...because it was needed...

This hero... who was a populist, and sought only to free south and central america from the ox collar of american corporate greed and exploitation..

Was branded as a communist in the 60's by the CIA and successfully scrubbed from the american psyche...

What motive might a person have to use a headline claiming that this amazing man was a racist have?

This man who refused, despite Castro's urging, to join the Communist Party?

Might he not be a true Son of Liberty?


At a dedication of a Tree of Liberty in 1766...Silas Downer said:

"We do therefore,
in the name and behalf of all the true SONS of LIBERTY
in America, Great Britain, Corsica, Ireland or
wheresoever they are dispersed throughout the world,
dedicate and solemnly devote this tree to be a TREE of LIBERTY.

----May all our councils and deliberations under its venerable branches
be guided by wisdome, and directed to the support and maintenance
of that liberty, which our forefathers sought out and found
under trees and and in the wilderness. ---


May it long flourish, and may the SONS of LIBERTY often repair hither,
to confirm and strengthen each other.

--When they look towards the sacred ELM,
may they be penetrated with a sense of duty to themselves,
their country, and their posterity:

--And may they, like the house of David,
grow stronger and stronger,
while their enemies,
like the house of Saul,
grow weaker and weaker. AMEN


The Internet IS the Liberty tree.

[edit on 28-5-2010 by seataka]



posted on May, 28 2010 @ 05:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Thirty_Foot_Smurf
Didn't this communist fighter of the evils of capitalism copyright his image so no T-shirt with his image on it could be sold without paying him a royalty?

Funny how this turd butchered so many just to wind up a capitalist in the end.


I think you have that backwards:


For ideological reasons, the new socialist regime did not want to stoop to embrace copyright or trademark law, a tool of the capitalist world.


Che Guevara, the Trademark



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 06:39 AM
link   





THE END






new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join