The recent election provided the ideal ground for these type of studies, thought they might fit best here...
Racial Prejudice Predicts Opposition to Obama and his Health Care Reform Plan
Eric D. Knowlesa, Brian S. Loweryb and Rebecca L. Schaumbergb
aUniversity of California, Irvine
bStanford University
Received 19 October 2009; revised 23 October 2009. Available online 3 November 2009.
Abstract
The present study examines the relationship between racial prejudice and reactions to President Barack Obama and his policies. Before the 2008
election, participants’ levels of implicit and explicit anti-Black prejudice were measured. Over the following days and months, voting behavior,
attitudes toward Obama, and attitudes toward Obama’s health care reform plan were assessed. Controlling for explicit prejudice, implicit prejudice
predicted a reluctance to vote for Obama, opposition to his health care reform plan, and endorsement of specific concerns about the plan. In an
experiment, the association between implicit prejudice and opposition to health care reform replicated when the plan was attributed to Obama, but not
to Bill Clinton—suggesting that individuals high in anti-Black prejudice tended to oppose Obama at least in part because they dislike him as a Black
person. In sum, our data support the notion that racial prejudice is one factor driving opposition to Obama and his policies.
Implicit and Explicit Prejudice in the 2008 American Presidential Election
B. Keith Paynea, Jon A. Krosnickb, Josh Pasekb, Yphtach Lelkesb, Omair Akhtarb and Trevor Tompsonc
aUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
bStanford University
cThe Associated Press
Received 27 August 2009; revised 30 October 2009. Available online 5 November 2009.
Abstract
The 2008 U.S. presidential election was an unprecedented opportunity to study the role of racial prejudice in political decision making. Although
explicitly expressed prejudice has declined dramatically during the last four decades, more subtle implicit forms of prejudice (which come to mind
automatically and may influence behavior unintentionally) may still exist. In three surveys of representative samples of American adults, explicit and
implicit prejudice were measured during the months preceding the election. Both explicit and implicit prejudice were significant predictors of later
vote choice. Citizens higher in explicit prejudice were less likely to vote for Barack Obama and more likely to vote for John McCain. After
controlling for explicit prejudice, citizens higher in implicit prejudice were less likely to vote for Obama, but were not more likely to vote for
McCain. Instead, they were more likely to either abstain or to vote for a third-party candidate rather than Obama. The results suggest that racial
prejudice may continue to influence the voting process even among people who would not endorse these attitudes.
Not a surprise to me.