It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Charlie Sheen has penned a fictitious conversation with President Obama regarding the 9/11 attack. See, the star of "Scary Movie 3" — and "Scary Movie 4" — believes that Bush/Cheney planned it all and feels Obama should investigate it immediately, in an effort to answer a "bottomless warren of unanswered questions." Now, never mind how repulsive this is to anyone personally affected by the terror attack. Sheen is just awesome for revealing what makes conspiracy theorists so pathetic.
Originally posted by Faiol
3 - really, if 911 coverup wasnt true, well, none of the media would ATTACK and REFUSE an debate with charlie on larry king LIVE
Originally posted by johnmhinds
He didn't bring anything new to the table, he just made himself look like a jackass.
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by Faiol
3 - really, if 911 coverup wasnt true, well, none of the media would ATTACK and REFUSE an debate with charlie on larry king LIVE
You are making an "argument from silence" fallacy; that is the erroneous belief that because no one has responded to the allegations therefore the allegations must be true. There are a multitude of reasons for not wanting to engage in such discussions, none of which have anything to do with the allegations being true.
Originally posted by johnmhinds
I'm sorry but anyone who agrees with what Charlie Sheen says is on the far fringe of the even the conspiracy community.
All he did was repeat the same clueless truther questions but in a fake interview with the President of the USA, which for a while was portrayed as being a real interview for ratings.
He didn't bring anything new to the table, he just made himself look like a jackass.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
reply to post by Faiol
Is it fair to say that Greg Gutfeld is obviously an ass-hole?
Originally posted by jprophet420
reply to post by johnmhinds
Well if you cant refute the points it makes sense to do a character assassination instead. I am assuming you cannot refute the points he made, please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks.
Originally posted by johnmhinds
Originally posted by jprophet420
reply to post by johnmhinds
Well if you cant refute the points it makes sense to do a character assassination instead. I am assuming you cannot refute the points he made, please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks.
No point in me doing that, whatever is said wont be taken on bored by anyone who is dumb enough to agree with anything Charlie Sheen has said and done.
People have been successfully debunking every 9/11 conspiracy for 8 years now guys (including everthing in Sheens fake interview), you should all take this event as a reason to move on to something new before you get even more marginalized by society.
Originally posted by Faiol
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by Faiol
3 - really, if 911 coverup wasnt true, well, none of the media would ATTACK and REFUSE an debate with charlie on larry king LIVE
You are making an "argument from silence" fallacy; that is the erroneous belief that because no one has responded to the allegations therefore the allegations must be true. There are a multitude of reasons for not wanting to engage in such discussions, none of which have anything to do with the allegations being true.
ok, lets start again, since they removed MY ENTIRE post, well, good job mod,
lets assume you are a smart guy, and you read the letter ok? you jump fast in this board and you write all these words full of nothing ... for me thats an insult ...
I am SURE you didnt read the letter, because if you did, since you are a very smart guy, you would know that all the information is provided by MAINSTREAM MEDIA COVERAGE and really, you can find the source for all the information in the bottom.
The letter is not his opinion, the letter is an DOCUMENT providing 20 FACTS about 911 that he thinks are the best.
ok, what now?
Originally posted by johnmhinds
I'm sorry but anyone who agrees with what Charlie Sheen says is on the far fringe of the even the conspiracy community.
All he did was repeat the same clueless truther questions but in a fake interview with the President of the USA, which for a while was portrayed as being a real interview for ratings.
He didn't bring anything new to the table, he just made himself look like a jackass.
sure, the best way to fight 911 coverup is to hide in a online board and do nothing ... well, thanx for that man, you are helping a lot the families of the people that were murdered ...
charlie is risking his career and life doing this, lets hope more people famous like him step up this way, trying to make the headlines to make 911 subject discussed again ...
[edit on 15-9-2009 by Faiol]
This.
It's been over 8 years, and I think the amount of people who can be woken up with documentaries and youtube videos has peaked. It will take publicity stunts like Charlie's to grab the attention of the rest of the people. Since most of those people are zombified by television, who better than the highest paid t.v. actor to shock them into awakening?
[edit on 15-9-2009 by Trauma]