What hit the pentagon on 9/11/01?, page 3

posted by Seventh

posted by SPreston

After cropping the impact Still Frame;

The aircraft shape is still visible (partially obscured by smoke or photoshopping) above the parking lot entry booth after the bright hot explosion short of the Pentagon wall.

The shape is formed by the trees and whatever in the background. . . . . . . . . . . . .

I vote that absolutely nothing hit the Pentagon. Just explosives.

posted by jthomas

So you claim there's an aircraft visible in the security cam video frame?

No jthomas. If you had the most miniscule ability to read, you would know that I claimed no such thing. But of course your duty is to twist and spin. Truth is something alien to you isn't it?

The shape is formed by the trees and whatever in the background. Do you understand these short easy 2nd grade words? Is English your native tongue jthomas? This means that I agree with you jthomas that there is no evidence that anything hit the Pentagon. See jthomas; it is possible for you to get one thing right in your entire life. Good thing you never gave up trying isn't it?

Not an aircraft. Not Flight 77. Not a Tomahawk cruise missile. Not a Predator drone. Not an A-3 Skywarrior. Not a Romulan Warbird if that was your next photoshopped exhibit. Not any flying mechanical device manufactured by human or alien. Nothing hit the Pentagon on 9-11-2001. No jthomas not even Wile E Coyote riding his rocket; he was over at Shanksville diving into the strip mine.

For more information on successful photoshopping, see our resident photoshopping expert and all around parking lot security video debunking guru jthomas.

posted by jthomas

Isn't it interesting that I have never claimed that the "security camera video shows any aircraft hitting the Pentagon." Just so we're clear about that, I want you to show everyone here any post I have made on any forum in which I have said that the security camera video shows anything hitting the Pentagon.

If you can't do that, then you will issue a public retraction right here, correct? What's that, you can't? C'mon, be a sport, just try.


In fact, as we rational people have said for years, one cannot conclude by looking at the security camera video that anything hit the Pentagon.

jthomas Photoshopping Incorporated

reply to post by Lillydale

---

Why don't you tell us what you think instead of demanding answers from us?

No one here knows for sure, hence the countless of different theories people keep coming up with. And a link probably wouldn't convince you anyway by the sounds of it.

Lets face it, all the government has to do is show a proper video of the supposed plane hitting the pentagon, then all theories would completely vanish. Surely to christ there has to be more than one, and not just a few frames which don't really show anything that remotely looks like a plane.

They could easily silence the doubters, but they choose not to. But why? Now that is a good question.

When I look at the only video of the supposed plane impact, it, to me, just looks like a bomb went off. So I personally think nothing hit the pentagon
that day.

Originally posted by jthomas
Sorry, we all accept the evidence that you pretend does not exist.

Which evidence is that?

I haven't made any unsupported claims. The evidence for you to refute has been given to you.

The only claims you really have made are that you have made no unsubstantiated claims. Well...you have me there, smartguy.

You're upset because you know you cannot refute the evidence to which I have repeatedly pointed all of you. So you just whine, desperate to shift the burden of proof.

Ummmmm...are you serious? Explain to us all exactly where the burden of proof should lie? Lay it out in basic argument terms. I will start you. A)Makes a claim and B)Does not. Feel free to use them.

Sorry, your evasions don't work, and they never will. You are the one making unsupported claims. I have repeatedly pointed you to the evidence for you to refute and you avoid doing so like the plague. YOU are the one claiming there were no passenger bodies at the Pentagon then whine that you never claimed any such thing.

You're just showing the true nature of "denial" in all of it irrational forms.

Now, you have two missions.

Wow. You use waaaaay to many words to say absolutely NOTHING. I have not evaded anything, I am all over the friggin' place. I beg you to challenge me and you cannot. You do realize that others can read this, do you not? Why is it that not one of them really cares to even try to back you up?

Huh?

Wha?

Hear that? Shhhhhhhh...That is the noise you hear when the only one who you are fooling is yourself and if you want to try to lie to yourself and pretend that what you say has any merit, please have at it. You are like a dancing monkey. Now, see if you can get some OS'ers to back you up in this little argument about the burden of proof. It is easy. I can already see you bobbing and weaving. It is ok, none of that makes you invisible.

Now, say something stupid.

1. Present the evidence for YOUR claim that there "were no passenger bodies at the Pentagon." Or, retract that claim.

First of all, thank you, that was perfect.

1. What would be acceptable as evidence of no bodies?

I want to get this right for ya, sir!

Any other stupidity?

2. REFUTE the evidence that AA77 hit the Pentagon starting here, the same evidence I have repeatedly given you:

wtc7lies.googlepages.com...

Do you know what evidence is? Ok, is it any page on the web that supports your argument? I am sorry. Do you have any e v i d e n c e? Websites are pretty. I have some, too. I was looking for evidence.

oh right

1. Show me some actual evidence for just one damn time so I can actually refute it, please.

And further evasions by you will demonstrate conclusively that you have NO interest in the truth whatsoever.

I lost interest in your 'truth' a long time ago. Now you are an unruly pet be funny in your lack of sense, turn stupid into endearing, and mess on the carpet.

The ball is in your court. The burden of proof remains on YOUR shoulders.

Does it? How is that again?

By the way, Lillydale, do you have any clue what the purpose of the 9/11 "Truth" Movement is?

Hmmmm. Well I have not paid my membership fee in a looooooong time and I never paid for the last two CD's that they sent me if I were to guess, I would say the search for the truth about 9/11.

I really do not care, perhaps you should ask someone wearing a "I am a truther pin. If you close your eyes, lay still and keep really quiet, then one will be by.

Frank Probst, an information management specialist for the Pentagon Renovation Program, left his office trailer near the Pentagon's south parking lot at 9:36 a.m. Sept. 11. Walking north beside Route 27, he suddenly saw a commercial airliner crest the hilltop Navy Annex. American Airlines Flight 77 reached him so fast and flew so low that Probst dropped to the ground, fearing he'd lose his head to its right engine

www.moaa.org...

Several bodies were found huddled in groups near televisions. Pentagon workers were apparently watching the carnage taking place at the World Trade Center when the hellish scene on TV became reality for them, too.

When Williams discovered the scorched bodies of several airline passengers, they were still strapped into their seats. The stench of charred flesh overwhelmed him.

www.usatoday.com...

ARLINGTON, VA – As Jim Ingledue sifted through the charred debris all around him at the Pentagon, a shiny square of white plastic caught his eye. It was a woman’s driver’s license........

Later, Ingledue looked her up. He discovered that Suzanne M. Calley was a 42-year-old strategic marketer from San Martin, Calif., who died on board American Airlines Flight 77

www.artbistro.com...

Reporter Mike Walter

www.youtube.com...

Mary Owens, "This is Local London", 9/11/02

Gripping the steering wheel of my vibrating car, I ducked as the wobbling plane thundered over my head. Once it passed, I raised slightly and saw the left wing dip and scrape the helicopter area just before the nose crashed into the southwest wall of the Pentagon

"I was right underneath the plane," said Kirk Milburn, a construction supervisor for Atlantis Co., who was on the Arlington National Cemetery exit of Interstate 395 when he said he saw the plane heading for the Pentagon. "I heard a plane. I saw it. I saw debris flying. I guess it was hitting light poles," said Milburn. "It was like a WHOOOSH whoosh, then there was fire and smoke, then I heard a second explosion.

Steve Patterson, who lives in Pentagon City, said it appeared to him that a commuter jet swooped over Arlington National Cemetery and headed for the Pentagon "at a frightening rate .‚.‚. just slicing into that building."

www.washingtonpost.com...

I was just about to make my turn up the sidewalk towards one of the entrances when I heard jet engines. It was not the normal jet track into National Airport, which is very, very different. I turned my head about maybe 90 degrees towards the sound of the engines, which were very loud. I fully expected to see A-10s or F-15s or something, and I saw the American Airlines airplane coming down. I watched the entire terminal descent into the building. It’s probably the loudest noise I ever heard in my life. I have heard artillery very close. I have heard rock concerts, but nothing came close to that noise. I watched the entire airplane go into the building

Army Captain (now Major) Lincoln Liebner. His statement and 139 pages of other stories from the Pentagon are here....

history.amedd.army.mil...

Engine 101 actually saw the jetliner plow into the northwest side of the Pentagon. The radio crackled, “Engine 101—emergency traffic, a plane has gone down into the Pentagon. I made a quick U-turn and was on scene within a minute to a minute and a half of the initial impact

arlingtonfirejournal.blogspot.com...


Flight 77 passenger personal effects found in the wreckage of the Pentagon...
onlineathens.com...

Will add more tomorrow.

reply to post by Swampfox46_1999

---

Hey, Swampfox. Come a little closer, I do not want to have to yell.

There is a reason that I do not care for these muddled threads full of any and every link and article and disinfo hit piece you can get your hands on.

The question is really quite simple.

What

hit

the

Pentagon.

If you are really into providing a ton of useless information that distracts the lower hanging fruit, go do that with the thread about the wings. Here is should be really simple. You do not even need to use a complete sentence.

Just tell me what hit the pentagon.

reply to post by Donny 4 million

---

You truly did not mean to direct your tirade at me, did you?

Second line.

reply to post by jthomas

---

Thank you for finally posting something true, correct, and fact filled. I bet this is the closest you will ever get.

reply to post by squidboy

---

The tagline on your video is false. That footage has aired on CNN more than once. Not to mention, he is talking about Flight 77 (and not a missile) hitting the Pentagon.

US Consulate Whistleblower Says 9/11 Hijackers Passports were issued by the CIA
  Posted 18 days ago with 21 member flags

9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags

Hollywood Stars Seek to Make Feature Film Focused on WTC Demolitions
  Posted 19 days ago with 12 member flags

An Overview and Debunking of the AE9/11T\'s List of Demolition Signs
  Posted 15 days ago with 12 member flags

9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags

Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags

Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags

new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: