It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Why don't you find what I actually said about what the condition of the wings should have been after and impact like that.
Originally posted by Orion7911
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by Orion7911
The evidence supports NO PLANE HIT
a No-brainer.
so what are you being pissy about?
There is no such evidence. There are lots of fanciful claims that no jet hit the Pentagon, but not a single piece of positive evidence for that has ever been presented.
Since Not a single piece of conclusive evidence has ever been presented that proves any jet HIT the pentagon,
Originally posted by TheAntiHero420
reply to post by jthomas
As for physical evidence on the ground there is very little.
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by TheAntiHero420
reply to post by jthomas
As for physical evidence on the ground there is very little.
Says you?
Originally posted by TheAntiHero420
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by TheAntiHero420
reply to post by jthomas
As for physical evidence on the ground there is very little.
Says you?
Yes, says me, but I'm not the only one. You should check out the clean up crew statements, i mean you referred to them in one of your many posts.
[edit on 9/22/2009 by TheAntiHero420]
Originally posted by Badgered1
As mentioned, the wings of the 'planes that hit the WTC towers, and the plane at Shanksville all seemed to leave very clear wing shaped marks. So this plane was built differently?
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by Badgered1
As mentioned, the wings of the 'planes that hit the WTC towers, and the plane at Shanksville all seemed to leave very clear wing shaped marks. So this plane was built differently?
I suppose at this point in the discussion - 8 years hence- if you still don't understand the fact that the Pentagon was a vastly different construction than the WTC towers or a vastly different crash site than the reclaimed strip mine field in Pennsylvania, you'll never understand the differences.
Enjoy.
Originally posted by rush969
OK Lillydale. You want a simple answer to your question.
Where are AA77´s wings?
Here it is...
They are no more. They ceased to exist. They were destroyed in the crash of AA77 on the Pentagon building on Sept. 11-2001.
The crash of the aircraft against the building was of such characteristics that what were the wings was destroyed totally. They disintegrated as a result of the collision with the building.
Originally posted by Lillydale
You are going to have to back up your claim and I am not fishing through an entirely different thread to do it. Have proof, toss it out here.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Someone already tried to claim that for the first time in history matter ceased to be. You are going to have to back up your claim and I am not fishing through an entirely different thread to do it. Have proof, toss it out here.
YES
I provided the link here in ATS where all of this has been discussed and evidence has been shown regarding your questions
Can you please provide "your evidence" for this claim?
Thanks to you all the same.
Originally posted by gavron
So, you'd rather ignore a 280+ page thread that discussed this topic already (from 2004), and start another one here?
Sounds like you really aren't interested in the answer then, are you?
Originally posted by rush969
Originally posted by Lillydale
Thanks so much, have you read this thread?
YES.
Someone already tried to claim that for the first time in history matter ceased to be. You are going to have to back up your claim and I am not fishing through an entirely different thread to do it. Have proof, toss it out here.
I provided the link here in ATS where all of this has been discussed and evidence has been shown regarding your questions
You are forgetting something kind of important. How do the wings hit that wall with enough force to "destroy completely" without making a crack or even a scuff on the wall they evaporated against?
Can you please provide "your evidence" for this claim?
I have already thanked people for just saying things because they like to say them. I would like to see someone say something and then prove it finally.
Thanks to you all the same.
Originally posted by rush969
reply to post by Lillydale
1.- The answer you were seeking has been provided.
2.- The information is all here. The ATS link and many other web sites have also been given to you.
There´s only one little question that I asked you.
How can you make a claim that the wings and engines didn´t leave marks or damaged the walls of the Pentagon?
Can you prove what you say? Provide an image of the “undamaged walls” maybe?