Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by jthomas
Now, you seem to think that somehow proves that I am looking at shattered airplane wings.
NOT on your life, Lillydale.
Thank you for admitting that you have a picture that no more proves anything you have said any more than anything that I have said. About time you man up.
I showed you quite clearly why you cannot rely on photos of the debris to make the claim that there is no wing debris. There is no point in denying that, is there? You agreed with me and now you are forced to admit that YOU cannot use photos to claim there is no wing debris.
I already made it crystal clear that I cannot discern of what that debris is composed. And neither can you.
Um....no. You did not make it crystal clear as you presented the picture as evidence of wing debris.
Nope. You know I did just the opposite. I showed you why you can't tell of what the debris is composed.
Now you claim you do not know if it is or not and that you made that clear????????
Crystal clear. You KNOW I Did.What confuses you about exactly what I wrote, to wit:
Exactly. Now you are catching on. You can look at that photo of debris all day long and you agree that you are unable to tell us of what that debris is composed.
Not one thing in that picture indicates that it is debris from "shattered" wings.
Since you agree you cannot tell us of what the debris in the background is composed, then you would agree that you cannot tell us that the debris does not contain wing debris. You can only say, "I don't know."
That was easy, wasn't it. All you have to do is learn to be skeptic and you can learn to ask the right questions and answer them yourselves.
But as I told you long ago, you have thousands of people who can tell you. You can ask them yourself what the debris was they walked through, picked up, recovered, and removed, but you repeatedly refuse to ask them.
In the meantime, we have absolutely no reason NOT to accept ALL of the evidence that AA77 hit the Pentagon. Neither do you.
If you have made it so crystal clear that you do not know what those are pieces of....then why did you present them as an argument for wing debris all over the lawn?
Once again, you know I didn't do any such thing. I used them to show you why YOU cannot use them to say there is no wing debris. I showed you, once again, why you should interview the over 1,000 people who walked through the wreckage, handled it, removed it, and sorted through it, and ask them what that wreckage was.
You'll recall that you repeatedly refused to find out what the evidence is.
Now you are forced to retract your claim, Lillydale:
"OK I guess that seals it. Thanks to this thread here we now know for sure that there were no wings on whatever did hit the pentagon so I guess the OSers have to go back to the drawing board."
I don't recall ever seeing it used in any textbook or journal article. At least you didn't claim that a
planes wings can fold back against its body like a bird wings. 
