It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rush969
Sorry, my bad!!
First time using this quote feature. I guess I got it backwards.
Is this the way it should have looked?
Originally posted by rush969
YES.
I provided the link here in ATS where all of this has been discussed and evidence has been shown regarding your questions
Can you please provide "your evidence" for this claim?
Thanks to you all the same.
Originally posted by jthomas
You have no capability to tell anyone what the wings should have looked like after an impact and you know that.
Either demonstrate that AA77 did not hit the Pentagon or withdraw your claim.
Originally posted by Indigenous equity
The wings folded back upon impact and mixed in with cement and construction materials. The building collapsed on top of the rubble that was the airplane.
There is not a lot to an airplane, its mostly sheet metal and wiring, upon an impact of this nature they would disintegrate and mix in with object they are hitting.
Sorry, but thats just the way it is. No magic missiles, no holograms...just some really crazy people that killed a lot of people and did a lot of damage.
Originally posted by rush969
reply to post by Lillydale
I already gave you the answer to your question twice.
So here it is one more time.
The wings were disintegrated. I never said evaporated. There´s a difference. I´m sure many things got actually evaporated there but the wings at least the whole thing didn´t. They broke apart in thousands of pieces or maybe millions. Some smaller than others. There are pictures of these things I talk about.
If you would only bother to go through the thread I provided, you would see this. But if you don´t want to or you don´t change your mind after looking through that information, well that´s your loss.
About the Pentagon walls and pictures I would like to see the pictures you talk about with no visible damage from the wings of the plane.
I would venture though, that one of the reasons part of the building collapsed was the damage that the plane and the massive engines caused to the structure.
And I would like to add that this doesn´t actually belong in a new thread. You have not presented anything “NEW” worth discussing. The same thread I talked about discusses all this.
Originally posted by rush969
On this photograph you can clearly see damage to the outside part of the wall of the Pentagon. Right side of the collapse. It is damaged caused from something that hit the building from the outside. This of course was the right wing of AA77.
www.geoffmetcalf.com...
You talked about "undamaged" outside of the Pentagon.
I would be looking forward to a retraction on your part. Of course I can sit here waiting, and I know it will not come...
[edit on 3-10-2009 by rush969]
Originally posted by rush969
You are kind of funny Lillydale!!
You cut the photograph to show nothing and ask me to point at something that´s not visible in THAT part of the photo!!!
But the photograph is bigger than what YOU show.
So I guess you have "shown your true colors".
Right, like the photo in my post that I got from YOUR LINK.
What I´m glad for though, is that people can read my post and see for themselves in the link that I provided, what I´m showing you.
So the only one you are fooling is yourself.
By the way, in the other link that I provided last, picture number 11 is the one showing some remains of the wings. You said there were none.
Well...now you know.
[edit on 4-10-2009 by rush969]
LOL. You are funny. So let me see if I am following along. The wings hit so hard that they broke up into millions of microscopic pieces and you can see that in your picture? I cannot see it.
I am glad that you think you caught me being deceptive using your own picture on the same page you posted the link to them but that does not change the fact that you have not shown exactly where this wing damage is. I see the damage you want me to look at but then the wings would have had to be the lowest part of the plane and I am pretty sure they were not.
Just show me where these wing remnants are and where they hit the building. I will not bother to try and shoehorn another one of your pictures in until I can properly shrink it. Good one on catching me not doing anything sneaky though - it really helped distract from the fact that you cannot outline what was asked of you.
[edit on 4-10-2009 by rush969]
Originally posted by whaaa
The pentagon had a lot of cameras trained on path of the plane. The citgo station had a video of the crash. Until those videos are released; I cannot believe the official story. To many unanswered questions.