It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Date: 10/21/1999
From: [email protected] (John locker)
To: [email protected]
Firstly , I would ask Dr Boylan at what distance the space base orbits the earth, surely if his informant has given him detials , this aspect is of utmost importance !
My ex-NSA informant revealed that there has been a manned "deep space platform" in orbit above Earth for over thirty years! "It [has] had three-man [American] crews as well as Russians 'on' since '68!" He further states that since 1973, the space station received additional extremely-high technology, "and has had upgrades since." His disclosure confirms reports I had heard previously from former military officers about a secret space platform in orbit. This disclosure makes clear that the Cape Canaveral Space Shuttles launches, and the "first" American space station being assembled by NASA', are just government "cover" programs. Such programs have served to deflect the public from becoming aware before now of the existence of a black- project military space station, and of classified military craft which can go well past orbit into deep space.
This disclosure makes clear that the Cape Canaveral Space Shuttles launches, and the "first" American space station being assembled by NASA', are just government "cover" programs.
Originally posted by peacejet
reply to post by Max_TO
So, you are trying to say that there is a possibility of a secret space station? It has already been discussed once here and it is impossible to operate an secret space station. With the peoples eyes in the sky it would have been easily detected.
Originally posted by jra
All that activity wouldn't go unnoticed.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Originally posted by jra
All that activity wouldn't go unnoticed.
Yes it would.
And the people who knew about it would be cleared to know.
You don't know everything JRA, especially when it come to military operations in space. You only get what you're given.
Originally posted by Max_TO
We seem to be going a bit off topic , there is no way we can prove or disprove an argument as to the possibility , or lack there of , of a secret station and the ability of such a project's ability to remain " hidden " from the general public
Originally posted by Historical-Mozart
There is a major website that has a bunch of pictures that had been taken by a dude here on Earth and they show shapes that do NOT match that of the ISS and the space stations are quite large, with most of them a lot bigger than the ISS.
Originally posted by jra
reply to post by Max_TO
Were any of that true, then what I'd like to know is, what rocket(s) put it up there? Not to mention all the resupply and crew launches that would have been required, plus supposed upgrades. All that activity wouldn't go unnoticed.
This disclosure makes clear that the Cape Canaveral Space Shuttles launches, and the "first" American space station being assembled by NASA', are just government "cover" programs.
Launches by craft large enough to loft the pieces required to build a space station are visible over hundreds of miles, so there is no way to get one up there unnoticed. The station itself would be visible as the ISS currently is. Additionally there is no way to hide the huge amount of infrastructure that is required to logistically support such an operation.
Originally posted by defcon5
Yes, Zargon had those pictures on here as well. I took them over to the Bad Astronomy Board, and they were identified as “Poorly taken, hand shot, photos of satellites and the ISS”. The folks over there were even nice enough to provide similar pictures that they had taken of known objects while working with their telescopes.
They have strange looking shapes because they slight motion of hand holding the camera causes a different blur depending on the way the camera is shaken (even indiscernible shaking when taking a pic like that will cause a blur).
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by Max_TO
We seem to be going a bit off topic , there is no way we can prove or disprove an argument as to the possibility , or lack there of , of a secret station and the ability of such a project's ability to remain " hidden " from the general public
Nothing off topic about it, its more like you don’t want any scientific facts presented which disprove your theory.
Originally posted by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
Wow, I'm shocked, a sight full of 'debunkers' (hate that word) says that some of these had to be the ISS/satelites at different angles, motion blur etc. Honestly, didn't see that coming. I hope you understand that is their opinion and in no way a solid fact.
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
Wow, I'm shocked, a sight full of 'debunkers' (hate that word) says that some of these had to be the ISS/satelites at different angles, motion blur etc. Honestly, didn't see that coming. I hope you understand that is their opinion and in no way a solid fact.
Are we talking about John Lenard Walson's hoax pictures or something else? I do remember seeing "secret space station pics" on bad astronomy before JLW made his debut. They did look like poorly taken ISS photos during an early phase of its construction. My own first video of ISS is not recognizable as ISS. In fact, it looked much more like some kind of UFO.
(I wasn't very good at website design either:
speur.tripod.com...)