Every single so-called "skeptic" or "debunker" I see here suffers a form of discrimination that is the definition of ignorant.
Without having ever met me personally, or knowing
anything about my life, I am accused of being in some organized cult, of having a virus, of
being psychologically disturbed and all number of completely unwarranted accusations that amount to
ad hominem.
I don't suppose it is possible, for one of these people to imagine that
so many individuals would ever come forward for their own personal
reasons to criticize the federal reports describing 9/11, or without branding themselves with such a stupid label.
No, since that is obviously impossible, I must obviously be in some kind of organized cult.
Now let me describe to you the elaborate rituals of my cult:
I post on ATS.
Since the term is really only used in a derogatory way, it has become an insult. That no one uses except "debunkers."
SO posted this, and this forum is supposedly still under its effect:
Unfortunately, many of those who choose to debate the issues surrounding 9/11 conspiracy theories on ATS remain unswayed by our simple rules of
civility and decorum and continually seek to skirt the intent of This Thread. Therefore, we are faced with one of two choices... close the forum, or
get more strict. In the interest of promoting the civilized debate and discussion of important issues, we're getting more strict.
...In all my years being involve in various online communities, boards, and forums, as well as conspiracy theorists, I've never experienced the level
of vicious personality attacks that I'm currently seeing within the spectrum of debate and discussion defined by "9/11 conspiracy theories and Truth
Movement."
We hear over and over again from those in the "truth movement" that there is nothing more important than exposing the "inside job." To you I say,
then there is nothing more important than expressing your points with civility and credibility. For both sides of the argument, if you're
unable to communicate these issues in a deserving manner, then you are not concerned about the issues at all, you're simply entertaining yourself
through insults and you're not welcome here.
We Can't Discuss The Credibility Of Participants?
If you feel compelled to discredit those who espouse 9/11 conspiracies, promote 9/11 activism, engage in 9/11 conspiracy debunking, or tell their
first-hand 9/11 stories, then do so with facts and reasoned analysis. Simply stating they're a member of a "sect," a popular debunking site, or any
other simplistic "guilt by association" statement will result in a "9/11 Madness" warning.
Unless I am interpretting this incorrectly,
"
If you feel compelled to discredit those who espouse 9/11 conspiracies, promote 9/11 activism, engage in 9/11 conspiracy debunking, or tell
their first-hand 9/11 stories, then do so with facts and reasoned analysis. Simply stating they're a member of a "sect," a popular debunking site,
or any other simplistic "guilt by association" statement will result in a "9/11 Madness" warning."
using the term "truther" as a derogatory term, or insinuating
without reasoned analysis that we are an organized cult, etc., and thus
avoiding a scientific/analytical debate, is a violation of ATS terms, at least on the 9/11 forums.
I have a feeling that if any derogatory use of the term "truther" was disallowed, we would hardly ever see the word
at all on these forums.
Obviously similar for "twoofer," which is even more immature and used by some of the same people.
Bottom line is I'm an individual. I'm not a group. I don't model myself after any group mentality. And by accusing me of that, one simply
demonstrates their complete inability to think critically. Because I came here alone, with only me, myself, and I, and if you want to talk to me,
disrespecting that fact is only going to irritate me. Because I do not like having to remind ignorant people of obvious facts. I don't believe the
same damned things you stereotypically think everyone else does, and neither does anyone else here. Stereotypes are not real, and they are never
civil, respectful or logical arguments. Thank you.
[edit on 8-9-2009 by bsbray11]