It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – When attended by a registered midwife, delivering a baby at home is a safe alternative to delivery in a hospital, according to a Canadian study.
The findings echo those of a Dutch study published in July that found that a planned home birth is as safe as a planned hospital birth, provided that a trained midwife is available, a good transportation and referral system is in place, and the mother has a low risk of developing any complications.
Originally posted by ChemicalSubstance
The findings echo those of a Dutch study published in July that found that a planned home birth is as safe as a planned hospital birth, provided that a trained midwife is available, a good transportation and referral system is in place, and the mother has a low risk of developing any complications.
Originally posted by ChemicalSubstance
The reason I've posted this here is because I 'almost' lost my wife back in 2005, she suffered a Postpartum hemorrhage shortly after giving birth.
She was given the drugs oxytocin and methylergonovine that each help the uterus to contract to stop the bleeding but it didn't work so she had to have a minor but major lifesaving operation, and thankfully she was saved in no way that could have been done at home.
[edit on 7-9-2009 by ChemicalSubstance]
yes...but suppose there was in fact, something seriously wrong with he baby when born? perhaps the umbilical chord might get tightly wrapped around the kids neck..a doctor would respond immediately.. most i assume might panic in fear and start messing things up. I'd feel safer with the kid being born on hospital. there are too many factors that can go wrong.
Many c-sections result in infections and other complications. Forcing birthing mom to labor on her back also increases pain involved with the labor process. Back pain can not be alieviated since she can not move into more comfortable position. Hospital births are not all that safer for everyone. Sometimes the hospital policies cause problems which would not otherwise have occured.
Why is it less likely to happen in all the animals in the world except us?
Originally posted by burdman30ott6
My wife wanted to have natural childbirth with our first born. After 30+ hours of excruciating labor, they discovered that my son's head was too large (92nd percentile) and an emergency c-section was required. As soon as he was out they handed him to me and while I was showing him to my wife (they were trying to do all the internal clean up that goes along with a c-section) she had a brief couple of seconds of incredible joy and relief. At the moment they said they were taking my son to the mother/baby room and asked me to follow, I hear my wife cry and say "God it hurts!" as I turn around and see she was spraying blood badly. That was one of the hardest things I've ever done in my life, choosing between going with my newborn son and wanting to stay beside my wife and hold her hand. This was in Tucson, AZ.
Two years later, in Washington State, when our daughter was born via c-section, I saw how things are supposed to go. After I had my daughter in my arms (wailing like a banshee as opposed to the exhausted little boy two years prior following 30 hours of labor) I sat by my wife's head so she could see and interact with our daughter while they got her cleaned and stapled up and then we ALL went to the mother/baby room together.
In both cases, home delivery would have probably resulted in disaster.
Originally posted by Donnie Darko