Does Anyone Know Who These Men Are Yet?

The Men at WTC 7 that said "Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon."

How did they know it was coming down soon?

Who are they?

Who did they work for?



It's been almost 9 years, does anyone know yet?

Good question, does anybody know more? Also what ever happened to the thing about the bomb on the washington bridge on the day and the people they arrested? 4-5 people it was, and we never heard anything about it again.

Yeah, its unusual. Notice they wanted people to "keep their eye on that building>"?

I mean, there were other buildings burning top to bottom but they seem to want people to focus on WTC-7.

Notice the choice of words? "it will be *coming down soon*. He knew not only that it would be "coming down" but that the time was approaching. How would he know the "timing" of such a rare event?

Just who were these guys?



[edit on 3-9-2009 by talisman]

Anything to do with this guy I wonder?

Also...

Was it only me who remembers the reports of car bombs in New york on 9/11?

newsmine.org.../car-bomb-explodes-outside-state-department-on-september-11.txt

www.infowars.com...

Nobody else ever talks about it...

reply to post by mr-lizard


Interesting! Thanks for the links

[edit on 3-9-2009 by ChemicalSubstance]

Originally posted by talisman

Just who were these guys?
[edit on 3-9-2009 by talisman]

B.B.C News reporters?.

Originally posted by ChemicalSubstance
The Men at WTC 7 that said "Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon."

How did they know it was coming down soon?

Who are they?

Who did they work for?

It's all right here.

Those guys in the video look like demolition guys.

Besides due to national security and the amount of top secret information held in all 3 towers it is obvious that they had to be brought down.

Think about it. A terrorist or spy posing as a fireman would have more clearance and authority than the highest level cia agent in such an event as a fire. Rigging the building with explosives and maintaining them would be in the countries best interest.

Yes the buildings were rigged for self destruction.

reply to post by Seventh

B.B.C News reporters?.

Since when did BBC news reporters speak in American accents dressed in demolition outfits?

how did they know it was going to fall? It was burning for hours and it had taken great damage from the towers falling. It was just a matter of time.

Originally posted by prizim
how did they know it was going to fall? It was burning for hours and it had taken great damage from the towers falling. It was just a matter of time.

It hadn't suffered great damage from the towers falling. And it was only the third steel frame building to have EVER collapsed through fire, WTC1 and WTC2 were the two others on that very day!

I can't believe I'm still having to say this after eight years, IT WAS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!

Seriously, any person who cannot see that WTC7 was brought down deliberately by controlled demolition is completely deluded.

This one fact has been supported by hundreds of demolition experts around the world. People continue to proclaim that the laws of physics were suspended for that one day, that steel frame buildings collapsed due to fire for just one day only, that there is not clear evidence of people stating that "it is being brought down", and I cannot believe their complete ignorance. It really is shocking.

But it just goes to show how easy it was for these criminals to do this. If so many of the American people have no grasp of the laws of physics, how would they ever question something like this?

Policeman calmly said "The building is about to blow up."

At about 10 seconds one of the people coming towards the camera realized there was a camera and quickly turned his head.

Very wierd.

I had not seen this before, thanks.

reply to post by prizim

how did they know it was going to fall? It was burning for hours and it had taken great damage from the towers falling. It was just a matter of time.

Then why didn't these buildings fall?

reply to post by ChemicalSubstance


Different buildings, different construction types

WTC 5 & 6 were low raise, conventional steel frame buildings unlike WTC
1, 2,7. All these buildings used unusual engineering techiques in their construction

WTC 1 & 2 were tubular, lattice work of steel columns for exterior wall,
light weight steel trusses for floor tied into hollow steel columns in core

WTC 7 used long span cantilever trusses for support =- was built on top
of Con ED electrical station.

These are all just from WTC 7 and don't include Ghouliani's prior warning or the BBC and CNN's reports of it's collapse before it happened...
Reports of Foreknowledge of the Collapse of Building 7 in the Oral Histories.

reply to post by thedman


Good answer, but I still don't buy it.

I find it too difficult to believe.

Why did all four corners of WTC 7 fall straight down into a neat little pile and why didn't it topple over to the side if it was only one side that was damaged?

You would have thought it didn't have any support columns, by looking at the way it went down.

[edit on 9-9-2009 by ChemicalSubstance]

[edit on 10-9-2009 by ChemicalSubstance]

reply to post by ChemicalSubstance


It wasn't that all four corners failed - it was internal collapse which pulled the building down from the inside

Column on 13th floor was dislodged by heat stress (thermal
expansion). This left section above unsupported whch failed triggering
cascading collapse as section after section failed outwards from the
initial point.

On November 20, 2008, NIST released its final report on the collapse of 7 World Trade Center.[52] In the report, NIST explains that fire was the main reason for the collapse, along with lack of water to fight the fire. Fires continued to burn throughout the afternoon on the lower floors. At 5:20 pm. a critical column buckled, leading to the collapse of floor 13, which triggered a cascade of floor failures and global collapse.[53] From collapse timing measurements taken from a video of the north face of the building, NIST observed that the building fell at free fall acceleration through a distance of approximately 8 stories (32 meters, or 105 feet).[54] The entire building above the buckled-column region moved downward as a single unit, until completion of the global collapse sequence.[55]

reply to post by thedman


If these construction types are so unique that no other steel fremed building has collapsed from fire, why was it assumed it would come down? Are you honestly saying those people knew the construction methods employed in WT7? That they knew that this building would fall BECAUSE of it's construction method, even though it was the third to go in history and is significantly different from the first two????

Thedman is clearly employing the "A wizard did it" theorem. When something unique, unusual, and bizarre happens, to support the mainstream story of events, all you have to say is "A wizard did it." Problem solved.

The structure of those towers were so heavily redundant in their design, to watch them fall the way they did is... laughable. They acted like there was no column support at all in their structure, which we know very much well was there. It's like they just instantly became a gaseous, liquidy vapor. Very unorthodox for steel buildings, as I recall steel being a very solid object that required temperatures higher than a simple office fire to melt.

Oh yes, and may I remind our audience of the thermite recently confirmed in the 9/11 dust?