It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by turbofan
Yes, very nice.
Also include the fact that the antenna sat on a 'hat truss' assembly,
( a matrix of steel beams angled and tied together) yet managed to fall FIRST. Nobody has been able to explain how the antenna fell before
Musta been some of those explosions cutting the core and hat truss for
that to happen.
Nice screen shots by the way.
Originally posted by The Songwriter
It would make alot of sense, the only thing is why would anyone do this and kill thousands of people? Money... Retaliation...
Conspiracies are all good, but when peoples families have been destroyed due to maybe a government act or terrorist attack, people don't want to know!
Originally posted by micpsi
The smoke coming out of a window (or windows) above the impact point is not due to explosives. It is simply smoke from the fireball created by the plane entering the North Tower and exploding that was forced by the rush of hot air through gaps in upper floors created by this explosion and then expelled from open windows.
Originally posted by GenRadek
reply to post by Seventh
News people and companies are never always right. They also make many mistakes and report misinfo on accident, when the information is still preliminary and the events are unfolding as they are on.
Case in point: Hurricane Katrina coverage and the events at the Superdome. As I recall, news media across the board were reporting rescue helicopters under constant fire from the ground, mass rape squads marauding about the Superdome raping all in their paths, murders and killings, bodies stacked like cordwood in and around the Superdome. Sounded like a warzone. What happened a few days later? Oh, sorry, there were no rape squads, or mass murders, or helicopters getting shot at. Was there any apology or retraction? nope. Did they all pat themselves on their backs during the awards for best reporting during a natural disaster? oh yes.
Media isnt what it used to be. Now they all run like a pack. All parrot the same thing, no matter the source, if its credible or not.
Recall during 9/11, reports of bombs and explosions at the Capitol Building? Were there any? nope. Another plane hitting the WTC7? Nope. Didnt happen either. And yet in those first few hours there were reports of many things going around, many based on facts, others rumors, speculations, etc. The media is not all knowing and perfect.
Originally posted by Seventh
Originally posted by rainfall
If anyone is not sure if there were explosives in the buildings, this is a good clip to watch:
You have to ask yourself, if there were explosives planted in the buildings, that would mean this 'event' was pre-planned, then you have to look at, 'who had access to these buildings'.......
O' look, George dubya's little brother, Neil Bush...
His company was in charge of securities for the World Trade Center complex... how convenient...
PEACE and LOVE..