It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by one_man24
Evolution is as faith based as any religion.
Originally quoted by Kaytagg
And when they get sick, let a faith healer take care of it. I don't want my antibiotics wasted on them.
Evolution is as faith based as any religion.
Originally posted by Mike_A
Even if we take that as true (I don't) in what way is that an argument for teaching creationism? If anything it's an argument for removing evolution.
"Evolution" - things change over time. This is obvious and doesn't even require proof, although there is plenty.
"Survival of the fittest" - aka - "Natural selection" - is also obvious. It's why certain animals no longer exist.
I personally believe that creationism should be taught in schools, but, not in science classrooms. Why? Because, it can't be definitively proven
Originally posted by Lasheic
reply to post by Clickfoot
"Evolution" - things change over time. This is obvious and doesn't even require proof, although there is plenty.
"Survival of the fittest" - aka - "Natural selection" - is also obvious. It's why certain animals no longer exist.
Your understanding of evolution is as flawed and fictional as one_man's. If what you described is what you think evolution is, then one_man is right - You're just believing it on faith.
I'm not saying you have to have an evolutionary biologist caliber understanding. Nobody really cares if you don't know the specifics of Genetic Drift or Punctuated Equilibrium. But good GOD man, at least try to get the basics right.
As for whether or not creationism should be taught in schools. I absolutely think it does. When I was in school, I learned about Greek gods, Egyptian gods, Roman gods, Norse gods... and all their creation myths. But nobody really believes in those gods anymore. People DO still believe in Abrahamic gods though... and if you're going to live in a world in which contains a substantial population of believers in those religions, I think it would be useful and poignant to learn the basics of what those mythologies teach.
However, it has NO place in the science classroom.
Science classes should be primers on current academic theories and why their accepted so that students can be brought up to speed on the current state of academic acceptance. Science is not a democracy. It is a tyranny of evidence, and we are not obligated to debate hypothesis which are devoid of supporting evidence in high school. Debating the merits and evaluating the evidence of hypothesis is work for the Universities... not the uneducated student. If it's mentioned at all, it should be mentioned only in historical contexts alongside geocentricism, phrenology, and the four humors as a demonstration of how and why the scientific method works.
...rather than trying to read the contradictory creation myths in the Hebrew scriptures (see Creation Myth # 1 : Genesis 1:1 to 2:4b and compare that myth (written with the Prophet Hezekiel's Babylonian Accent, by the way, not Moses !) with Myth #2 (Genesis 2:4b to 4:30) written with a different paleo Hebrew writing style from the 7th century BC.
the ORDER of CREATION is different (male and female are created together in the Image of Elohim on the '6th day')
whereas in the 2nd Myth of Creation of the Jews, Adam is 'formed' (not created, 'bara') out of pre-existent mud material, to tend a pre-existent garden,
then animals are created to be a sexmate for him, and when none of the animals could arouse 'Adam', a piece of flesh was taken from his 'side' and poof ! Hayaa was 'formed'.
In the 1st Myth of the Jews, the Hezekielite language is continued in genesis chapter 5:1-3 'in the day when Elohim created man, male and female created he them in his own image and he CALLED THEIR NAME ADAM and blessed them in the day in which they were created' , so ADAM is both male and female according to Myth #1 (there is no EVE/Hayaa in Myth #1).
The reason why people doubt evolution is because it cannot be observed.