It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zosynspiracy
reply to post by Dermo
You thinking is typical. Arrogant, one sided, etc.
Originally posted by MoothyKnight
HA! Russia can't attack us or they'll have our primary investors/partial owners to answer to, CHINA.... I don't think they are a threat regardless.
[edit on 8/27/09 by MoothyKnight]
Originally posted by neformore
reply to post by sanchoearlyjones
Was the US posturing for war with Russia when it decided to deploy its ABM system in Western Europe?
The Russians are as entitled to defend their territory as anyone else is, aren't they? Why would this be a precursor to anything?
Originally posted by sanchoearlyjones
Russia has deployed their highly advanced, and widely reported upon missle defense system as stated in the article; "The Far East".
Originally posted by Zosynspiracy
reply to post by Dermo
You thinking is typical. Arrogant, one sided, etc. Russia has more oil, more natural gas, more timber, more minerals than all NATO countries COMBINED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why for a second would you think Russia would be hurt economically if a world war ensued? In fact I think just the opposite. I think a war would spur economic growth and industrial output. It would be like what happened in in America during WWII. We became an economic powerhouse because all of our energy, manpower, innovation, money etc. went into military industry and the war machine. Russia is a vast country. War with NATO, US, Western Europe would be akin to throwing fire on gasoline especially since the US and Europe are in financial ruin right now. You act like the world relies on Europe and the US for everything. The US and Europe rely on the world for its natural resources. America is far from the country it was in the 1940s and 1950s.
You know how many countries would lend support to Russia if a war ensued as well? China for one would love to see American beat down.
Originally posted by CanadianDream420
Originally posted by sanchoearlyjones
Russia has deployed their highly advanced, and widely reported upon missle defense system as stated in the article; "The Far East".
How is this "posturing for war"????
Cause the U.S deployed their Missile Defense in Poland to protect against Iran?
LOL.
Tic for Tac
Originally posted by sanchoearlyjones
reply to post by Dermo
Uh, I don't think Russia is any worse off than any other country right now. In fact since they had the Georgian War last year, they've faired better on selling gas to all of Europe.
Originally posted by sanchoearlyjones
Hi All,
The title states it all. Russia has deployed their highly advanced, and widely reported upon missle defense system as stated in the article; "The Far East". They reportedly did this to shield themselves from North Korea, but I don't think North Korea has ever been much of a threat to Russia. Especially considering they are on the opposite side of Russia of most Russian infrastructure, culture, and government.
However, what is over on their "Far East" is US friendly Japan, South Korea, and not to much further the Continental USA.
The amount of missiles deployed doesn't seem like that much, but the overall transfer of there seems odd. Something to definitely keep an eye on. Here's the full article below with a link.
en.rian.ru...
Russia has deployed advanced S-400 Triumf air defense systems in the Far East to counter the potential threat posed by N. Korea's missile tests, the chief of General Staff said on Wednesday. "We have already deployed a battalion of the S-400 systems in Russia's Far East in order to guarantee protection from failed launches of [N. Korean] missiles and to ensure that the fragments of these missiles never fall on Russian territory," Gen. Nikolai Makarov told a news conference in the capital of Mongolia. North Korea has test launched several ballistic missiles from its eastern coast since January. The missiles are believed to be Scud-type and traveled up to 500 kilometers (300 miles) before falling into the Sea of Japan. Makarov said Moscow was concerned over the proximity of North Korea's missile launch sites to Russia's borders, and would continue to take preventive measures, including the use of sophisticated air defense systems, to protect the country from failed launches. The S-400 Triumf (SA-21 Growler) is designed to intercept and destroy airborne targets at distances of up to 400 kilometers (250 miles), twice the range of the U.S. MIM-104 Patriot, and two-and-a-half times that of Russia's S-300PMU-2. The system is also believed to be able to destroy stealth aircraft, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, and is effective at ranges of up to 3,500 kilometers (2,200 miles) and speeds of up to 4.8 kilometers (3 miles) per second. A regular S-400 battalion comprises at least eight launchers with 32 missiles and a mobile command post, according to various sources. The new state arms procurement program until 2015 stipulates the purchase of enough S-400 air defense systems to arm 18 battalions during this period. Russia has previously deployed two S-400 regiments to protect the airspace around Moscow and industrial regions in the central part of the country.
Wake Up, Stand Up,
Sancho
Originally posted by neformore
reply to post by sanchoearlyjones
Was the US posturing for war with Russia when it decided to deploy its ABM system in Western Europe?
Originally posted by Dermo
reply to post by heineken
Just because the music in that video gives a menacing impression while it shows images of tanks and soldiers doesn't mean Russia are looking for war. I could make a video like that for the Irish "Army" and guarantee it would scare people.. no matter how unfounded.
Fair enough, previous to WW2, war was a viable answer to bad economic conditions.. Not anymore though.
Do you think Russia would give up its newfound capitalism, wealth and progression (which has come in leaps and bounds since the fall of the USSR) for a war against NATO which it would undoubtedly lose and a collapse in trade with the EU which would completely decimate its economy?
eh? No!
Originally posted by TheCoffinman
you don't know the history of russia do you... even in world war 1, when the russians were in disarray and eventually bowed out because of revolution, nobody invaded them... they'venever been takin over in thier history. they defeated naplean, they defeated hitler, even the collapse of the USSR didnt lead the western countries of the world to try to invade russia.. i think war is more likely to break out between the ukraine and russia... perhaps that being the spark...
Originally posted by Yummy Freelunch
Well, now that we are "divided" , so to speak. Russia knows America is falling, we are broken..good time to take over...
Originally posted by Dermo
I know plenty of History.. including that. But what difference does that make? People here are saying that Russia is a threat and posturing for war.
But what you are forgetting is that back then there was no NATO, no EU superpower, no US superpower, no China superpower.. No anti terror coalition... no global trade agreements, no United nations etc.. Just eugenics, far right and left politics and dictators itching for war.