It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hey it wasn't that long ago we had 9/11 folks, it's better to be safe than sorry
Originally posted by uaocteaou
Hey it wasn't that long ago we had 9/11 folks, it's better to be safe than sorry
I am getting so sick and tired of people using this statement to justify the actions of jack-boot thugs with an authority complex.
That has been applied to warrantless wiretaps, indefinate detention, guantanamo and the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan.
That phrase is the biggest cop out statement of the 20th. and apparently the 21st. century.
[edit on 21-8-2009 by uaocteaou]
Originally posted by chise61
reply to post by jd140
If he already expierianced trouble taking pics of that building why would he return to the same building and do it again?
Maybe because he wants to exercise his first amendment rights. Maybe because he has every right to photograph any building that he wants to as long as he can see it from the public way. Maybe because the minute we accept them infringing upon our rights like this we all lose them forever.
Maybe because in protecting his first amendment rights he is protecting the first amendment rights of every American citizen.
I applaud him for doing what he did, we need more people to stand up for their freedoms.
Originally posted by jd140
While I don't agree with him being arrested I have to ask one question.
Is he looking for trouble?
It states that about 2 years ago he was arrested for taking photos of the same building. If he already expierianced trouble taking pics of that building why would he return to the same building and do it again?
Again, I'm not saying its right what happened to him. It just seems to me he went there knowing what would happened and now he is acting suprised.
Originally posted by uaocteaou
Oh, I guess i was confused, I thought the guy was photographing a multi-story building owned by the American tax-payer, during business hours in broad daylight. I didn't know he was taking pictures of someones home at odd hours.
Originally posted by uaocteaou
Oh, I guess i was confused, I thought the guy was photographing a multi-story building owned by the American tax-payer, during business hours in broad daylight. I didn't know he was taking pictures of someones home at odd hours.
Originally posted by habfan1968
He could be gathering info to sell to terrorists as well.