reply to post by Hanslune
hey there hans,
my mistake it was his grandfather.
it was a very compelling production.
The analysis by the forensic geologist was very compelling.
It is his opinion there is no way the kensington stone was carved after 1700.
And according to the geologist there is no way to fake this type of weathering.
His findings have been backed by others in his field and his paper was published and peer reviewd, I belive Byrd posted a link to it in another
thread.
The dotted double r rune, and the hooked x are the runes that really work to seal the deal for me.
They are two of the runic forms that the traditional runeologists say prove its a fake.
But the dotted double r is the rune that shows up in grave inscriptions on gotland.
then the fact that the hooked x is found in other places, such as other stones and also in the grave stones pf gotland, specificaly graves at
cistertion churches.
It is also found in rosslyn chapel in scotland, and in c columbus's signature after his return from the first voyage.
The geologist was somewhat dissapointed with the almost complete refusal by the archeological community to even accept the possiblity that the stone
is accurately dated.
If you have a chance ot view this pgm Hans I highly suggest it.
One point they brought up was that on the stone when it refers to the party red with blood and dead, that they might be referencing the plague.
This was discussd in a previous thread, that the drop in population of native americans in the early and mid 14th centuries could have been some sort
of epidemic.