posted on Jan, 8 2015 @ 05:04 PM
I am glad too see this debate going on. The Kaimanawa wall, the wall that never got looked at and never got challenged and never made it out to the
public. I come from a medical background and a civil engineering background also... However, in medicine we work with finding everything it isn't
before we suggest what it is this process is called diagnosis and is essentially like solving a little mystery. It might be a natural feature, however
no excavation ever happened on the site and thus no one ever ruled out it wasn't man made. Which is in my opinion a crime against humanity!
Considering it would have taken all but a few guys with some shovels and a couple of hours to see if the wall kept going somewhere, above below and
on the sides and if it did, then there is much more reason to keep digging. This however hard it is for some people to believe, never occurred and
thus we can never be sure.
There is plenty of reasons for everyone not to look though but they are stacks upon stacks of superficial reasons.
Please consider the reasoning below, it is an example of all the the reasons not to look at the obvious and how to move around them...
On the political/social problems of exposing “pseudo-archaeology” as real.
Well said, and I understand how complex this issue is. It goes far above and beyond what anyone is really willing to look at. To which I would like as
much help as possible from other researchers to help me on my quest.
Not only is this topic very much an issue, it is ideal on this website too. What most would consider "pseudo-archaeology" currently, is also the way
I got involved in realising what is going on in the world. I say "currently" because I have put together, or rather am putting together in writing
too many pieces of evidence to look past and be ignored. So thank you to all the pioneers, which everyone has contributed so much. Its a troublesome
process and then getting the information out is going to be equally troublesome. My theory is nothing new, I really have no new theories, All I can
see differently however is how the transition from being blind to being able to see, can all be shaped together. I am also aware of many sites
(archaeological and not internet) around the world, especially some which are close to home for me, which should be excavated! Yes I am claiming I
know where to look to find solid proof of this ancient enigma found in our past.
I know exactly where they are and exactly how the excavation needs to be achieved. However due to other political issues (loosely used term here as
it is more a capitalistic issue) such as the obvious "divide and conquer" tactics being used, and using indigenous peoples rights and with "hate
speech" acts in place, it is a very difficult and controversial topic to expose.
This however is easily addressed once you look beyond the issues of racial division, which will also need to be exposed. Just as this article here is
trying to suggest.
The second problem is that people will say it is going to be expensive and slow for no financial gain or profit so leave it alone. This however is
using a problem (money/capitalism) to try to avoid another problem, which is a joke but never less will have to be challenged also.
The third issue is going to be censorship either, on the sites themselves which I am proposing in my book(s) or before the information becomes
public.This again is going to be a problem that needs to be addressed and sorted out too before the publication can be made.
If my digs do make it to this point where the public is going to allow them.
Can we keep this archaeological site in the publics attention so any (artefacts) of a controversial matter cannot then be removed or hidden? Another
problem, but not without solutions also.
Finally if my proposed sites do turn over huge amounts of transparent findings of a controversial nature how do we move on from there? I imagine
everyone would become outraged at the fact that they have been so clearly manipulated for so long that chaos could ensue. However this is another
issue that is not without the possibility of a solution.
I believe, simply put that all these issues can be addressed in or before the publication of my findings “supposed findings” and all changes can
be made within the next few years despite the huge amounts of conflict we are going to face trying to do so.
I feel further more and past these issues, that there is a light at the end of the tunnel and it is the very real possibility of a world free from
debt and war, money and corruption and also many new areas of science to come to us. If I am one of those who is going to be shot down, ridiculed and
or just suddenly disappear on this quest.. Then so be it. Its not that I am courageous, it is more so just the acceptance that whatever we do in our
lives, we will one day die. Also, that if time is infinite which is hard not to imagine, that no matter what you do whether it great or very little,
really won't matter at the end of the day. If you are remembered for 3000 years, 3000 years is such a tiny piece of infinity (in the scale of time),
it is no more small of a fraction of infinite than if you are not remembered at all or by only a few for only a minute. Some would say this argument
is bleak and pessimistic, but on the contrary, this argument equally means that if you chose to look outside the box and find some solutions and have
a dream there is no reason for you not to chase it.
Death and poverty, ridicule it doesn't matter. So while we have this life that is very real, we may as well endeavour to create the changes suitable
for a better world. Even if those changes are but a small piece of the puzzle.