reply to post by 0bserver1
For me the biggest question mark here
is the fact that xldsign is not providing
any kind of details/facts, after more than 2 weeks now?
Anyone who follows the link to their site has
to agree with this observation.
A claim without facts, is NOT a claim.
I mean, how many times does one have to spell this
out before some start to check this out,
and see that I am not asking anything unusual?
Why should I bother investigating,
if the 'facts' were obvious and published?
The next big question mark is the fact that it
has turned out now, that none of the elements of
the cover-story are true.
There is no point repeating what I wrote in my
last few posts. It's all there.
(Only xldsign is involved, no publicity,
no land-owner involved, etc.)
Then, we have another big question mark related to the
so-called Dutch CC-scene?
As far as I'm concerned, they have failed dramatically
to inform people, and to seriously investigate this matter.
I know of only two actual serious CC-researchers in Holland,
who publish some of their findings in public.
Both of these individuals, so far, wisely,
have not made any statements about the DaVinci/Butterfly.
The rest of them, have exposed themselves
as mere 'gatekeepers'.
They are not actual researchers with a sincere intent
to study and inform.
DCCA and Niburu.nl are the two main axis involved in
spreading the initial cover-story, and one local newspaper
Everyone else is only linking to them, without doing
Meanwhile, the few in Holland who have heard about the
DaVinci/Butterfly, have either already forgotten about it,
or lost interest due to a lack of information.
Then, we have another problem.
Which established science lab/institute volunteers
to be openly associated with cropcircle research?
Unless you have a lab, it isn't very easy to prove something.
Then again, the hard fact of a giant cropcircle in
a Dutch field is very real indeed.
How did I get this info?
This information can be found on land-owner's website too.
I've provided the link earlier.
Also, you can learn many things while visiting the area,
look around, and talk with some of the locals.
If xldsign did not create this, who did?
Should we speculate?
Yes we should.
What does it all mean then?
As far as I'm concerned, I have already provided
some indication to my personal beliefs regarding
Regarding this particular cropcircle, I don't feel like
offering Delfgaauw the story, he is lacking so badly.
Many more things could be said about this design,
and I'm still awaiting their inspired explanation,
though hardly expecting any additional statements.
Delfgaauw and his companions are business men.
They are NOT artists.
They are NOT environmental activists.
Let's say, from a business point of view and regarding PR,
this 'project' can be considered a dramatic failure.
Who is going to invest time and money
in a mega 'project' like this?
No cause, no publicity, no revenue?
They could have established their name nation-wide,
even around the world?
The DaVinci/butterfly was harvested 17th of August 2009.
Why did they let the opportunity pass by?