It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Satyr
Actually, no. It's not our duty to "aid" everyone in the world. I'm not sure where this idiotic excuse to play world policeman came from. Our safety was never in jeopardy because of Iraq, IMO. My sense of what is right and wrong tells me that this is wrong....that we should leave people alone, unless that becomes impossible. We should never make it our policy to get into other's "family fights". In doing so, you only make enemies. Have you ever made the mistake of getting into a family fight, other than one of your own family's? You might understand what I'm saying, if so.
Originally posted by Satyr
We should never make it our policy to get into other's "family fights". In doing so, you only make enemies. Have you ever made the mistake of getting into a family fight, other than one of your own family's? You might understand what I'm saying, if so.
Originally posted by gkoelker
If you were witness to someone trying to kill someone else, would you intervene? Isn't that the "right" thing to do?
Originally posted by TheEXone
There is a bigger family that we all belong to, and thats the human family. Untill we realize that, and realize that we must help eachother this world will never be free, and there will never be true peace.
Originally posted by Satyr
Have you personally seen anyone getting killed way over there in Iraq? I can't see that far, and frankly, I don't care. I'm sure there are alot of people getting killed as I type. I won't pretend that it's my responsibility to stop it. It's not. Now, if it happens right in front of me, or in my neighborhood, that's different.
Originally posted by Satyr
We used to sacrifice people. It was normal to us, back then. It's just part of the civilization process, apparently. It's not our business to help them evolve, nor to try to force them to evolve. Furthermore, it's impossible. No one is going to solve their problems, but them. We don't. In our arrogance, we think everyone should want to be like us, and have what we have. It's just not true, and this is what pisses much of the world off about Americans.
[Edited on 5-11-2004 by Satyr]
Originally posted by drunk
They joined the army to fight for their OWN country not som1 elses so Strangelands is right,
O.K GeniusSage if u were a soldier of eithjer nation and you were ordered to fight som1 else's war what you think?
Originally posted by gkoelker
I may be wrong, but I did not realize that we used to sacrifice people. And I would have to disagree that sacrificing people is part of the civilization process. There is no fundamental necessity to sacrifice the lives of people that I have found.
I do agree that no one will solve their problems but them, however if we can supply them with the tools to do so, then is that wrong?
Also, is it not jealousy over what we have some of the cause of the hatred that people have of Americans? America is not just a dream for Americans, the world over, no matter where you go, you will find people that wish to come to America to find freedom, opportunity, security and stability.
Originally posted by Satyr
As far as I'm concerned, there's no point. In trying to help them in the past, what have we done? We've drawn attacks on our homeland. Is that what we had in mind? Good going!
It's gotten to the point that other countries barely have an identity, and this is what bothers them most. Not everyone wants to be a subsidiary of America, no matter how many TV's we might have per household.
Originally posted by RedOctober90
#1 The Iraqi government was stable and civlized before the illegal invasion.
#2 More died and are dying violently in the Iraq than before the U.S. and the coliation got there.
#3. No president would liberate a country just out of "being nice" Bush and his kooks had to lie to people to get into this war, a war in which you have to lie to the people becomes a war against the citizens and the other country. Look at all the other countries that could use "liberating"
#4 It is idiocy to even try to push a democratic form of government on a peoples whos culture/religion is not very compliant with such government systems.. just leave them and their culture be.
I support the European decision to stay out of war, to build up their economy and to advance society.
Originally posted by RedOctober90
Time to stop with the American (Does all right) patriot stuff. Let's look at the realities.
MORE people are being slaughtered now in this war than before we invaded. People are loosing jobs, the Iraqi economy is crushed, the civil war is breaking out.
BEFORE we got there, people had jobs, less people were dying.. no civil war, an active economy.
It's not the job of the U.S. to play world supercop, it's necessary to solve problems here at home before we start screwing up other countries, it's causing more terrorism! It is not a good thing to continue to ignite the islamic fundementalists even more.. so when a city is smoldering in your country then you may understand the consequences of forcing unwanted government systems/culture on the Islamic people who are not compliant with such concepts like "Freedom" and "democracy"
Why not just leave there culture alone? Just because they do things vastly differently doesen't mean there culture is wrong and ours is right. Who says demoracy is the only way? Especially when it's forced on people who do not want it/not capable of it.
The Europeans are doing it right like I said, worrying about fixing the problems at home before spending vast resources and lives on things that don't really help the homeland.
I am at the moment readying myself for the day when the major terror strike occurs in the U.S.A. homeland. While others are sitting around praising Bush who lied to his own people to go to war and kill thousands.
Orang....did you comprehend what I wrote initially?
I didn't need to hear a discertation from you about your views and warnings.
I sent this u2u to you to mention that you need to PROPERLY LINK/CITE your source of articles, etc.
I have done it for you since you failed to grasp what I was saying.
It will be the last time. Next time you post an article, etc. that is not given proper citation by link, etc. your post will be deleted.
seekerof
Originally posted by gkoelker
So, then it is only allright to help those that want help?
I was not speaking of how many TV's we have per household, I was speaking of the fact that we have enough food to eat, the ability to find a job, the power to do what we wish with our lives. I do not think that everyone wants to be a subsidiary of America, but many of them might like to be able to have enough to eat...
Originally posted by Satyr
You got it! In fact, it's impossible to help those who don't want help. You only end up infuriating them.
Originally posted by gkoelker
Who is to judge whether or not the average people of Iraq wanted help or not? I am not speaking of the radicals, the everyday people that were being oppressed and killed. Don't you suppose that they may have wanted help but didn't know who to ask? The children that were losing their parents, or the girls who could not go to school, don't you think they might have wanted help? We are seeing retalliation from the radical elements in Iraq as they struggle for power, and as they struggle to find out how their country works. All new countries have such growing pains. Does this mean that we should stop trying to help the average citizens that need it the most?