posted on Sep, 22 2007 @ 04:18 AM
Originally posted by The Axeman
That would require you to post intelligently, which you have NOT.
Review my post, I doubt you can question the intelligence of my posts. If you only refer to the above one, think about it. If you are unable to
understand the point I was making let me help you by explaining it to you
A mason can never declare or state what his organization is without requiring the listener to first trust a Mason. Their is always a secret part.
This part must be trusted to be what a Mason tells you it is, nothing bad and actually a good thing.
Unaccountable secret power uses this same tactic, trust me, we are secret but we are only doing good, how often in history have secrets been to
protect and serve all people, and how often have they been to protect and serve those who are the guardians of that secret.
You require trust, yet tell me I can not be trusted with your secrets, are you just hypocritical, or are you hiding things? Hey I don't know, but
blind trust of authority or power fairly works out well.
Wait actually I do know....
[edit on 22-9-2007 by Redge777]