It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If someone puts a gun to my head and tells me to deny Jesus or die.
Guess what I would do? That is what I'm talking about,do you understand?
I read from the KJV Bible and a jewish New Testament.In the jewish
new testament they use the name Yeshua for Jesus.
Ok, but because I sound like a nutter - is that the fault of me, or the person who perceives me as such? Does that fact that I sound crazy to you mean that I am wrong?
and in consideration of the fact that modern, highly evolved, sentient man has only been on the scene for less than 100,000 years, that the human being represents almost certainly, the very highest cosmological expression of the fully in-formed, intelligent creative expression of the Godhead.
Intelligence which is not within a certain range of understanding will be perceived as ignorant/crazy/nutty. 2 sides of that range. Above it, or Below it.
Does that count?
Originally posted by badmedia
It seems you are incapable of looking at things from any other perspective than your own. It seems you are incapable of even trying to take an honest look at another perspective.
As established, a random number is not possible in a world of casuality.
Lack of knowledge itself can give the illusion of chance, probablitiy and so forth. Once again, a poker game is a good example of this. Because we do not know all the cards, we rely on things like probablity, odds and chance.
If the choice is predetermined by causality, then there is no choice. This is about like saying the unknown card on the top of the deck of cards - which has a probability of being any card due to it's unknown, has a choice in what the next card will be.
I am not looking at those things in the same perspective. Rather than looking at things in the limited "now", I am looking at things over periods of "time", in which case there is no probabilty because the "unknown" factor is gone. I'm looking at it from the perspective of after the hand is played and all the factors are known.
* * *