You automatically assume that the person making the mark on the record is not a corrupt chimpanzee.
All the credit reporting agencies have standardized steps for a consumer to dispute erroneous negative credit items on a consumer's credit report.
It is not at all that difficult to remove negative credit items that were placed on a credit report falsely. It's simply a matter of obtaining
one's credit report, and filing the necessary documentation. A pretty straightforward, simple matter.
And frankly, except in the case of identity theft, the items reported are accurate nearly 100% of the time. How do I know? First, I have looked at
thousands of credit reports, and spoken with the clients themselves. When I bring up - in conversation with the client mind you - any negative public
credit items, the borrower admits the negative item to be accurate: "Oh, yes, let me tell you the story behind that tax lien/judgment/bankruptcy,
etc."
I have actually sat down with clients with the consumer credit report in front of both of us, and gone through the credit report in detail. It's
accurate beyond belief.
The only time it's not accurate is in the case of identity theft - Typically a close friend or family member with a drug problem that stole a credit
card from their parents. That's the typical story.
These banks and creditors would be in a heap of trouble if they were inaccurately reporting credit items on people's credit bureaus on a consistent
basis. The fact is, it would be grounds for a class action lawsuit. You simply can't get away with it.
Now, is there human error from time to time? I suppose it's possible - Especially if the creditor is a small, tiny organization and the reports
being filed with the credit agency are being filed manually by an individual human being. But most of these records are submitted electronically -
especially in the case of a big bank with millions of customers.
Remember, the majority of creditors that show up on the credit file are huge, mammoth organizations - VISA, GE Capital, Chase, etc. They deal with
millions of customers. It's relatively rare to see "Joe's Auto Finance" or some other small, tiny creditor no one has heard of.
Borrowers are perfectly entitled to obtain copies of their credit reports at least once per year for free.
It is illegal for creditors to deliberately and falsely place negative credit items on a consumer's bureau.
If you file a dispute with the credit reporting agency, and you provide supporting documentation, the creditor has to respond within a certain number
of days to the reported error. If they fail to respond, it's my understanding that the credit reporting agency would then remove the negative
item.
Remember, though, these errors occur very rarely - I would guess that it occurs less than 5% of the time. Very few people dispute their credit report
once they get a copy because it's accurate and thorough. Only in the case of identity theft do people typically want to dispute items.
You're part of the club, they're part of the club. This other guy being marked must be a chump, eh?
There is no club to join. If there were, I wouldn't be here.
And credit analysts and bankers don't look at their prospective clients as "chumps". First, it's unprofessional, and secondly, most bankers want
to help their clients to obtain their financial goals and see them succeed, not fail. Banks make a ton more money when a client is profitable and
financially healthy, not when they are in dire straits and failing.
The approach that most bankers take to clients with derogatory credit is this: Contact the credit reporting agency, clean up the mess, and then
let's revisit this credit request in 3-6 months. Banks want clients. They are trying to build a long-term relationship with clients. In cases of
fraud or identity theft, it's very possible to take a client with a bad credit report and turn the situation around.