It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Myrtales Instinct
, when God is nothing but goodness.
[edit on 30-6-2009 by Myrtales Instinct]
Originally posted by Roark
The problem with your whole frame of reference is that you don't seem to understand that the ancient world was very different to today's "information age". Very few people were literate. Even fewer had their works published or copied and distributed to the masses. You seem to expect contemporary eyewitness accounts from 2000 years ago from a circle of people who were largely fishermen and peasants, who were members of an unsanctioned localised cult, and in a backwater province of Rome! Can you not see how unreasonable it is to expect that? The fact that there are so many surviving original and ancient (if not contemporary) manuscripts relating to Jesus is a testament to the strength of conviction and belief of those who were authoring and distributing the written records that DO exist.
Originally posted by spellbound
Yes, John baptised Jesus.
Originally posted by spellbound
And if you need proof, oh well, find it.
Originally posted by Kapyong
Like I said - we DO have many books from that period describing many people.
Originally posted by Kapyong
And,
we DO have quite a few books from Christians.
So why do NONE of them claim to have met Jesus?
Nor Mary, nor Joseph etc.
Originally posted by Kapyong
This was the founder of the religion, and no-one met him ?!
You'd think accounts of meeting Jesus (or Mary) would make a Christian highly influential (we DO see forged claims like this,) but all we have is STORIES from unknown hands, and CLAIMS and BELIEFS of people who met Jesus.
Originally posted by Kapyong
Jude, James, 1&2 Peter, 1,2,3 John - all forged by unknown people who never met Jesus.
Originally posted by Kapyong
But not one single Christian ever met Jesus - how do you explain that ?
Not one single authentic claim to have met Jesus even by Christians !
Originally posted by Kapyong
Gday,
Originally posted by spellbound
Yes, John baptised Jesus.
Really?
Not according to the Gospel of John.
How do you explain that?
Originally posted by Roark
Originally posted by Kapyong
Jude, James, 1&2 Peter, 1,2,3 John - all forged by unknown people who never met Jesus.
Forged? Huh? Just because an author's lineage, context and historicity are not verified doesn't necessarily make a document "forged". Unless you know something I don't, of course.
Originally posted by Roark
The fact that the Gospel of John is not a facsimile of the other Gospels indicates that it has a different source and author. This actually strengthens its corroborative value rather than detracting from it.
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
Nevertheless, we cannot deny that the Christian Bible has at least some kernel of historical truth.
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
I cannot tell you whether the Christian Bilbe, or the entire Bible for that matter, is 99.9% true of only 10% true. Nevertheless, it is foolish and intellectually dishonest to say that is is 100% untrue.
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmintThe big question is not whether Jesus existed, but how he existed.
Originally posted by Kapyong
In John, there is NO Passover meal, Jesus is crucified on the Day of Preparation.
In the other Gospels, there IS a Passover meal know called the Last Supper, and Jesus is crucified on the day of Passover.
Originally posted by Kapyong
John's Gospel disagrees on the DATE of the crucifixion and gives a different story (NO last supper, Jesus is an allegory for the lambs being sacrificed.)
They are completely different stories.
Originally posted by Roark
You've got the temerity to talk about Genghis Khan's legacy* as being "exactly what we would expect"
Originally posted by Roark
and yet you refuse to accept the vast legacy of the historical person known as Jesus Christ
Originally posted by Roark
* The portrait of Genghis Khan was created 50-60 years after his death, coincidentally around the same span of time after Jesus' death when the first accounts of his life appeared.
Originally posted by boniknik
I wish you'd do some more research. Have you ever heard about the Nag Hammadi Library?
Originally posted by boniknik
The Gospel Thomas?
Originally posted by boniknik
Gospel of Mary Magdalene?
Originally posted by boniknik
Gospel of Phillip?
Originally posted by boniknik
Apocryphon of John?
Originally posted by boniknik
Apocryphon of James?
Originally posted by boniknik
The Acts of Peter and the 12 Apostles?
Originally posted by boniknik
None of those were included in the Bible. Those are first hand eyewitness testimonies.
Originally posted by boniknik
I gave you links to read, but apparently you did not read them.
Originally posted by boniknik
if you do more research you will also find out that the historical Jesus went to Tibet, and the Tibetans have written eyewitness account of Him.
We went down to the sea at an opportune moment, which came to us from the Lord. We found a ship moored at the shore ready to embark, and we spoke with the sailors of the ship about our coming aboard with them. They showed great kindliness toward us as was ordained by the Lord. And after we had embarked, we sailed a day and a night. After that, a wind came up behind the ship and brought us to a small city in the midst of the sea. And
I, Peter, inquired about the name of this city from residents who were standing on the dock. A man among them answered, saying, "The name of this city is Habitation, that is, Foundation [...] endurance." And the leader among them holding the palm branch at the edge of the dock. And after we had gone ashore with the baggage, I went into the city, to seek advice about lodging.