It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Instead of using a diamagnetic rotor, it might be discussed to build up a paramagnetic rotor,
for instance of platinum ( 1.9 106 ) or aluminium ( 2.5 104 ) (see [Ger 95]). The
forces will be attractive in this case so that the rotor spins with opposite direction than a
diamagnetic rotor (if it spins), but the absolute values of the torque should be of the same
order of magnitude as those of diamagnetic rotor.
Originally posted by Matyas
I'll also have you know the idea is nothing new. I published a paper on the exact same idea in '94 Extraordinary Science Magazine, which I have been subsequently embarrassed of in later years. Unless you have a good theory, it really is bad science.
A energy cant cross over from negative to plus or the other way. And still be the same energy.
For instance you cant say that -4 instantaneously will become -3 if it is applied a power of energy to change. -4 has to change X amount of times before it reaches -3.
If you have a diagram with +,- X and +,- Y lines. That will get you a image of a infinite big cross .It will have no ends unless you put them in.
But it will have a crossing point where the two lines meet. And that is called the zero time of observation. But to be able to measure anything with a 2 dimensional scale you first have to find it on a 3 dimensional scale. That means you have to go out side the vacuum to locate it. Because there is nothing inside the dimension of 0. And there is nothing that exists with just 1 or 2 dimensions. No matter how small or fast the energy is.