reply to post by NovusOrdoMundi
I agree. The only thing is that it would take awhile. A thousand years is a short time in evolutionary terms, but a LONG time for us. Unfortunately,
us humans have changed the world in a way such that natural balances aren't working the way they normally would.
Take New York, since this seems to be the area of the issue. In a natural forest with many predators and prey, it would work out fine. In a concrete
forest where the biggest predators are airplanes and the birds have adapted to feed off of the little vegetation in the area by uprooting grasses, I
don't know if it would happen. If geese were not flock birds, and were more solitary, I would say to leave it alone. But the flocks function as
single organisms and they are difficult to control.
The way these birds are adapting is only making them more destructive. Say, they put up lights or structures to ward away birds. We know that they do
this by airports. The birds adapt to get used to these things. They get used to the noise. They're evolving great, really. But they're damaging the
flora and other birds in the area are competing for resources. In theory it could cause to extinction of other species. According to Darwin, this
would actually be a good thing. I kind of agree, except that these birds can carry diseases and cause problems for other species in the meantime. In
small numbers or even normal numbers, this is fine. But in tens of thousands, um, it's excessive.
And we want to study the other species around and we want them to survive. That's why we support other endangered organisms, even if they've been
proven to just not be evolving or adapting quickly enough.
But that is my perspective. The true reason is probably because of the planes, and that's stupid. I think they should develop a way to keep the geese
safely away from airports, that's all.




