The Obama Probe Continues..., page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 59 times


reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 09:12 PM by PowerSlave
reply to post by Southern Guardian





Thats if he gave up his american citizenship to which there is no evidence he had. Dont you listen? I said this in my other posts. Just take a breather and read what I posted. According to Indonesia law a child must be under 5 years of age and must give up foreign citizenship to attain Indonesian citizenship in order to be legally adopted


Chill out SG.


If you had read my other post you have noticed I said Indonesia would not recognize/allow dual citizenship. Which is what you are trying to drill into me, but I alrwady know that.

What I also wrote is that The US would have still recognized his US citizenship if he had one to begin with despite the Indonesian Laws or requirements.

And stop with the attacks already......... I have not attacked you in any way whatsoever


reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 09:22 PM by mikerussellus
reply to post by Southern Guardian



Here, Bush's college transcripts.
2004.georgewbush.org...
I showed you his, now show me Obamas.

ooops.
can't
can ya?





reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 09:23 PM by nenothtu
reply to post by aero56



McCain's birthplace and circumstances are irrelevant. He wasn't placed into the office.

That's like saying I can't be a doctor because I've never been to Med school. It's irrelevant, because I'm not practicing medicine.


reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 09:27 PM by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to
post by Southern Guardian



Here, Bush's college transcripts.
2004.georgewbush.org...
I showed you his, now show me Obamas.


Now show me Reagans, fords, infact show me every college transcript of every president. Show me their birth certificates as well, and while your at it show me the evidence where Obama gave up his american citizenship and show me evidence of him being born in Kenya.

The weight of evidence lies on the accuser sorry.


reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 09:29 PM by earlywatcher
reply to post by Southern Guardian



explain again how you know lolo soetoro didn't adopt barry when lolo married stanley? particularly since only indonesians were allowed in the schools. why wouldn't he have adopted this child who was now using the soetoro name?


reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 09:30 PM by mikerussellus
reply to post by Southern Guardian


Sure, but you're ignoring the fact that I showed you Bush's transcripts.
Keep moving the bar. Change the scenario.
You still haven't shown be Obamas.

As a debator you disappoint me.





reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 09:31 PM by Eight
Originally posted by lpowell0627
There would be a plan. The plan would be impeachment. We the people put him in office and we the people can get him out. (Legally - not lethally)

The only plan I see is to badger the man to death, and I wouldn't put too much faith in impeachment, they tried that with Clinton and it didn't work and it made him even more popular.

You know why? The Republicans and a good portion of the American public were standing in a glass house throwing stones. Larry Flint proved that.


Unfortunately, this information doesn't help those looking to oust Obama since there are already way too many ways around this argument. To think that Pakistan would turn away an American because of a travel ban (advisory?) is crazy. We have money to spend. They want it. Same goes for Cuba.


I agree, and you’ve made some good points. I have my own proclivities about government and I keep a spot open for scandal, no matter who runs.


Even if exactly what was stated was true -- there's way too much wiggle room. You'll never be able to prove from which country he originated BEFORE he arrived in Pakistan.

Further, who the heck (meaning which department) is responsible for keeping all passport records? Nobody tracks everywhere you've ever gone with a passport.


It’s futile to fight the power structure. It has been designed this way to keep the American public ignorant. They don’t want us to be empowered because remember knowledge is power.

The average American is clueless when it comes to dealing with procedures and polices pertaining to the gorenment. What the American public needs to do is build a fundamental foundation of education on understanding how the government on the whole operates.



This is a dead end I'm afraid.

I concur.



Keep in mind he was a nobody at that time -- nobody would have bothered to keep tabs.


I think it's safe to say that many of the people in government started out that way.

Peace!


reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 09:38 PM by mikerussellus
reply to post by Southern Guardian



I've emailed the GHW Bush Library and the RReagan library for copies of their college transcripts.

Easy.

Now you do the same please.
But you can't. It's nice to pick and choose points to argue but you still are ignoring the fact that there are several points that Obama has kept hidden.
Why.
For an administration that has spewed transparency, it's as clear as mud.
Please respond.




reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 09:40 PM by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to
post by Southern Guardian



I've emailed the GHW Bush Library and the RReagan library for copies of their college transcripts.

Easy.


Wonderful, theres another 40 or so you need to request.


reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 09:44 PM by mikerussellus
reply to post by Southern Guardian



And once I do all their transcripts, I suppose you'll be on a different track.
Can't (or won't) defend his obfuscation.

tsk tsk



reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 09:45 PM by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to
post by Southern Guardian



And once I do all their transcripts, I suppose you'll be on a different track.
Can't (or won't) defend his obfuscation.

tsk tsk



Get me 40 other college transcripts please and their birth certificates, thanks. Might as well stop posting here and get on with it.


reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 09:55 PM by mikerussellus
reply to post by Southern Guardian




The fact is, you can't defend his actions. Any reasonable person can see that. I have similar arguements with my children. No you can't eat candy...well Johnny does...that doesn't matter...

It's called deflection.
Instead of arguing the actual point you deflect by pointing out something someone else "might have" done.

As a libertarian, I have just as many issues with Bush I, II, Clinton ad nauseum. . .
Obama is just the latest and not so greatest among them.

It must be nice to argue points of Indonesian Law, but you're missing (or deliberately avoiding) the point.

He is not honest.

The facts support this. Disregard any other presidency. Tell me how he is honest by hiding so much of his past.


reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 10:05 PM by PowerSlave
reply to post by Southern Guardian





You have been claiming Soetoro adopted him repeatedly, so if you listened you would have stopped that claim. Now that you recognize it Soetoro could not have legally adopted Obama. Im glad you get it.



Wow how arrogant are you?

Its time you actually read what I post.

For one my very first post I state "If he was adopted by Soetoro"
See the if there ???

Secondly there is no proof one way or the other of an adoption taking place. So claiming one or the other as true is unfounded.

Thirdly, There is also no proof that he was 5 or 6 when he arrived in Indonesia. Saying he was 6 does not make it true.

Fourth point... In my second post I state at least 2 times "IF" he was adopted.

So your condescending comment "I'm glad you get it"............


The rest of your rant is based on him being at least 6 which cannot be confirmed.


reply posted on 2-6-2009 @ 10:10 PM by Southern Guardian
Mike you aint doing yourself good with time if you intend to get me those birth certificates and college transcripts of all the presidents.

Originally posted by mikerussellus
The fact is, you can't defend his actions.


What actions? By going to Pakistan when he was young? Would you seriously get off it? If you seriously dislike the man I suggest you come up with relevant political argument, heck go on about stimulus, but this is seriously pathetic. Basically using old debunked campaign propaganda with absolutely nothing to show for it, this just isnt the way.

Any reasonable person can see that. I have similar arguements with my children.


My point was clear Mike, you ask the man for his birth certificate, then you ask for his long form, then you ask for his college transcripts then next you'll be asking him about what chicks he dated during his highschool years. In truth you'll never be satisfied because your issue with the man will always be personal and emotional, so any political relevance is irrelevant to you in all reality.

The fact your having "arguements" with your children is enough said in anycase.

It's called deflection.


You know of deflection yet you cant directly answer the evidence I put forward. I proved to you by the laws at the time why Soetoro could not adopt him and you quickly moved on from that to demanding his college transcripts and so forth, not replying directly to the evidence presented

You talk about about deflection Mike, and yet your a true example of it.

Right.

[edit on 2-6-2009 by Southern Guardian]
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
The CIA in Australia: America\'s Foreign Watergate
  Posted 2 days ago with 19 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 12 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 11 days ago with 10 member flags