It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I hate to admit it but most of what my ancestors knew is lost to time... I have stood on in the middle of Big Horn medicine wheel in Wyoming, and wondered just what did they know? as a child I remember my father taking me to Fajada Butte in Chaco Canyon, standing before the sun dagger watching that thin line of sunlight move across the spiral there... "What does it mean dad"? "I don't know, but its cool isn't it"? Such a shame so much all that lore was lost and were only now starting to understand just how much we they knew and we don't!
This was the greatest blunder that has ever been made in the history of Astrology" Now with this in mind, do you think current Zodiac readings would be reliable... Well according to this its not. It is out of touch with the real concept of Star Signs.
A month is the amount of time between new Moons and in the not so distant past lunar cycles of 35 to 36 days were recorded. This gave way for an 11 month and even a 10 month year as recorded in numerous examples. The cause for this controversial change in the length of Earth's year and lunar cycles is in my opinion the heart of ancient astrology.
Originally posted by Devino
reply to post by KRISKALI777
Lunar cycles are interesting but many ancient civilizations were more concerned with the cycles of the planet Venus, and for good reason. However, this is a start to another interesting story. A story that has been dismissed as ignorant superstition and nonsense in opposition to a myriad of testaments, myths and folklore and even some physical evidence.