Open the Camps - Obama Is Said to Consider Preventive Detention Plan, page 9

reply to post by GuiltyByDesign

---

i edited the last post i really don't know if they are genuine but a lot of detail put into each one.

This train of thought and actions of our government can only lead us to one conclusion. Our government is at war with us. I can see it no other way if the future is to be judged from our past.
Everyone should be aware of the 3rd id being activated and placed under Northcom late last year in preperation or anticipation of civil unrest. We should also keep in mind the predictions made by our world leaders of some "event", I dont feel like the "event" has taken place yet,also remember what Biden said about them making unpopular decisions? Could these type of decisions be what he was refering too?
What about states succeeding and something about mass movements of people? Either leaving said state or going to said state? Could martial law imposed after succession be the unpopular decision,push and push untill someone finally pushes back? Maybe falling into a very nasty trap losing all of our rights under martial law that only the president can declare an end too?
These are dangerous times for the simple people of the land,as one of our founders said, "These are the times that try mens souls."
I'll leave you with a very relevent speach of which I'll quote a part of.

I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other.

libertyonline.hypermall.com...

Originally posted by merkaba93
Putting this out in the open like this shows a new boldness. Detaining citizens without evidence or trial... indefinitely.

Will you stand for this?

As I said in the other thread on this subject right here you already did.

Bush Administration Wins Appeal in Jose Padilla Case

Sept. 9 (Bloomberg) -- The Bush administration can indefinitely detain a U.S. citizen it determines to be an enemy combatant in the war on terrorism, a federal appeals court ruled.

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, unanimously ruled against Jose Padilla, the only U.S. citizen now held as an enemy combatant. Padilla, jailed for three years without a trial, fought against U.S. forces in Afghanistan and was recruited by al-Qaeda to carry out terrorist attacks inside the U.S., the administration says. Today's decision reverses a federal judge's ruling that he can't be held without trial.

``We conclude that the president does possess such authority,'' which was granted by Congress in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks, the court said. Bloomberg.com

You guys are a bit late to the party.

Where were you when they were testing this out using detainees at Guantanamo and with the U.S. citizen Jose Padilla?

Why are you surprised it is now coming to your backyard when the process of allowing the usurping of our rights started during the second term of the last administration?

This is not new to anyone paying attention, although it does vindicate those that were smart enough to sound the alarm under the Bush years.

Too bad they were in the minority and shouted into silence by "patriots".

- Lee

reply to post by Raider of Truth

---

Thanks for the links. I sent them to my father so we know what exactly we should be avoiding. It's a shame to see so many of them built already and yet the people say... nothing. Well they can go ahead and keep being herded by the MSM and the govt. like sheep to a slaughter house (literally it seems) me? I'll be the wolf in hiding with my family.

I have been thinking that we would see increased evidence that we no longer have a multiple party political system. I'm not alone. It's not bad enough to have bad choices, we now have no choices. There is only one party and we are being tag-teamed like a bad wrestling plot.

Bush Sr. started us on this track as far back as 1981 as he was Reagan's controller. You will soon see subtle signs from Jeb Bush as he is primed for his run and we will have had the Sr Bush as NWO controller for over 30 years.

Following the attempted assassination of President Ronald W. Reagan, shortly after his inauguration, 1981, George Herbert Walker Bush, as Vice President, on a day to day basis, until the end of Reagan's second term, 1988, actually ran the White House. In 1988, Daddy Bush was himself elected President, actually Bush's third term. In so doing, the elder Bush was violating the U.S. Constitution, 22nd Amendment, restricting the President to two terms. - Sherman Skolnick on Conspiracy Planet

Daddy Bush and more

Clinton and Bush, together again...

It is odd to think of the two presidents seated side by side, chatting amicably about the events of the past 16 years, as they are expected to do, and about the global and domestic challenges facing the United States and Canada. After all, Mr. Bush set out to dismantle much of what Mr. Clinton accomplished, from balancing the budget to fighting global warming, even as

President Barack Obama has set out to erase the Bush legacy by reversing his tax cuts, prohibiting the torture of terrorism suspects, withdrawing from Iraq and rejoining the campaign against greenhouse gases. - International Network News.com

Clinton, Bush booked for Toronto appearance

Conspiracy theorists have noted for years that there is a Bush family dynasty that appears to be in charge or play a major leadership role within the Illuminati. - Alpha Omega Report

The Bush Clinton Alliance

"W" secured the camps. Obama will put them to use. The back and forth bickering in the media is to throw the sheeple off. That's always been the modus operandi. Cheney is either in on the plot or he will be the scapegoat. There is one team here and they always win. The country shifting hard right to hard left keeps everyone from noticing the continual slide to socialism. It did not start with Obama, it started long before all the living US presidents were trotted out to support NAFTA.

Signing of the NAFTA agreements

And so dealing with Gitmo detainees will be the opening for detaining dissenting citizens somewhere down the line.

reply to post by redhead57

---

You're damned right. Cheney is there for show, keeping us off balance. If he's not in on it, although I think he is, he will wind up as the scapegoat for the Bush years. Maybe another well timed heart problem would send the truth to the grave. (Does James McDougal ring a bell?) "A shame but bye, bye Dick! You were a great American!" The point is they're all on the same damn team. Rupublicrats or is it Democans?

Obama never had a "Civil Rights" background. The sheeple were made to think he did. He was black, lived in Chicago (never in the hood though), hung wit his peeps in the black militant church, how could he be anything but a "Civil Rights" activist? He was there for show and for the votes that came with the show. He's the tannest middle-aged white guy ever elected. You enjoy driving your sardine can hybrid while he's snug inside his armored Cadillac. A man of the peeps!

reply to post by Raider of Truth

---

Raider, I'm sure you're up on this but others might need to read this. Good posts, thanks.

When President Ronald Reagan was considering invading Nicaragua, he issued a series of executive orders which provided FEMA with broad powers in the event of a crisis, such as the violent and widespread internal dissent or national opposition against a U.S. military invasion abroad. They were never used. - United States Congressman Jim McDermott (D-WA)

Later in that same speech...

Criticism of the Bush administration's response to September 11 echoes Mr. Smith's warning. On June 7 of last year, the former Presidential counsel, John Dean, spoke of America sliding into a, quote, ``constitutional dictatorship,'' close quote, and martial law.

The McDermott speech of March 11, 2003.

Martial Law Concerns

I mentioned in an earlier post that Reagan was simply a puppet in office and Bush Sr had his hand "at the controls". The saddest part of McDermott's speech is that he was tipped off to this by reading an article in the Morning Herald from Sydney, Australia. Kudos to McDermott though for researching the topic.

Bush Sr., 28 years and counting. Watch out for the next Bush, he's on the way. To throw us off, this one's a Roman Catholic and a 4th degree Knight of Columbus. Pick a flavor, any flavor, the Bushes have it. Warms your heart, dont it?

I finally solved a great mystery! I think I see now...
  Posted 19 days ago with 72 member flags

Finally! MSM Coverage - Legal Challenges to Fed - The End is Near
  Posted 18 days ago with 48 member flags

‘Barcode everyone at birth’
  Posted 4 days ago with 20 member flags

Pentagon Source Alludes to Martial Law Around July 1st, 2012
  Posted 3 days ago with 19 member flags

FBI Seize Email server, then return it
  Posted 16 days ago with 16 member flags

Australia preparing for Global Revolution November 5 2012 begins today.
  Posted 8 days ago with 12 member flags

HSBC Insider - This Bank is a Criminal Enterprise Laundering Billions
  Posted 16 days ago with 11 member flags

Bilderberg Scheme To Save The Euro
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: