posted on May, 23 2009 @ 10:29 AM
This train of thought and actions of our government can only lead us to one conclusion. Our government is at war with us. I can see it no other way if
the future is to be judged from our past.
Everyone should be aware of the 3rd id being activated and placed under Northcom late last year in preperation or anticipation of civil unrest. We
should also keep in mind the predictions made by our world leaders of some "event", I dont feel like the "event" has taken place yet,also remember
what Biden said about them making unpopular decisions? Could these type of decisions be what he was refering too?
What about states succeeding and something about mass movements of people? Either leaving said state or going to said state? Could martial law
imposed after succession be the unpopular decision,push and push untill someone finally pushes back? Maybe falling into a very nasty trap losing all
of our rights under martial law that only the president can declare an end too?
These are dangerous times for the simple people of the land,as one of our founders said, "These are the times that try mens souls."
I'll leave you with a very relevent speach of which I'll quote a part of.
I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And
judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with
which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received?
Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of
our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love
and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive
ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this
martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in
this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for