It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Darthorious
However if it's a small helicopter even today well then I'm going to die as those things are tough to fly much less land lol.
Originally posted by pazcat
I find Helicoptors a much safer prospect as i have had a bit to do with them and i enjoy every moment if it.
Originally posted by flightsuit
Originally posted by pazcat
Originally posted by flightsuit
oops
Although i do agree and have made the same argument as yourself, helicoptors are not that bad, and they do glide not drop like a stone, its taught to the pilots nowadays, and surely operating at a lower altitude is better than falling from further up,
Originally posted by pazcat
Originally posted by flightsuit
...and surely operating at a lower altitude is better than falling from further up...
Originally posted by ahnggk
Originally posted by flightsuit
Sure, if you're compiling statistics according to miles covered, air travel may look a lot safer. But what if you change the metric you're tracking and compare fatalities per hour spent on the road, vs. fatalities per hour spent in the air?
Yes, fatalities on air vs on road with regards to hours spent, will definitely make flying a lot more dangerous.
The NTSB estimated that Shaw, 24, who had been hired a year before the crash, earned an annual salary of about $16,000.
The low pay, lengthy commutes and lack of areas where pilots could rest added up to a risk to passengers, said NTSB member Kitty Higgins.