It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jkrog08
reply to post by wmd_2008
So do you not think there is any chance at all of a old or current civilization on the Moon?There is A LOT of other evidence besides this(a lot more convincing) that at least in the past the could have been a alien influence on the Moon,and really it is a mainstream theory that we (now) have hidden bases on the Moon.I appreciate your skepticism,for it is necessary for any legit discussion site.But I will say don't close your mind so much it hurts.Right now there is a clear change in favor of A LOT of the main theories being true in Ufology.
Originally posted by Thill
Fantastic find Mike
-Now if somebody tells me this is a rock formation I will laugh so hard I might get some body injuries (so please don't for the sake of my health).
-Now its not a camera glitch also , I'm 100% sure.
-Its not a part of a previous mission (if i read the previous post right) as there was no previous missions i that part.
I have to say I have no clue as of what this is(but for some weird reasons I strongly feel I have seen those items in pic 1 and 2 before somewhere ) but it is definitely artificial.
[edit on 2-4-2009 by Thill]
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by underpassdweller
Similarly, I've wondered why our military satellites can supposedly ID a single person through 35 miles of polluted atmosphere here on earth yet they can't take a single decent hi-res picture of the moon.
There's an obvious explanation for your bewilderment. You've confused Hollywood's 'Enemy of the State' (Will Smith) with reality. Such resolution remains physically impossible, while making some people (eg, bin Laden) THINK it's possible has tactical advantages).
Originally posted by Kryties
The part has not yet been identified as any part coming from the Luna 13 lander. It does not correspond to any part we can see from the photo's. All other landing spots for the other landers are too far away for it to be a part from one of them either.
I have a big problem with people making vague & unjustified statements like this - firstly you think it doesn't come from the lander because you can't find anything like it in some photos - so what? Who's to say that the photos show you every bit of hardware on the lander.
You also say "All other landing spots for the other landers are too far away for it to be a part from one of them either." - Based on what facts? How would you know?
Oh and to answer your question, hypothetically if the moon were full of alien artefacts then it increases the chance of a lander happening upon one of them. Very simple logic that.
But it's not is it, so it isn't very likely at all.
You have some bits right in front of a lander that look strangely like they belong to the type of craft produced in the same era as the lander, yet you are convinced that it doesn't come from the lander but from some retro inspired space aliens.
Alien flared trousers & moon boots?
Originally posted by chromack
reply to post by mikesingh
Looks like a drill bit. Hoagland's JPL photo analysis shows "tractor tracks" and evenly spaced "drill holes" all over (the place!) the craters just about everywhere.
Wouldn't surprise me that this is a drill bit!
Originally posted by FT1980
reply to post by mikesingh
They have to be fake, I mean how old are these images really?
Originally posted by kinda kurious
( FYI, I have processed Luna 13-Image #2 ("fishnet floats") using a variety of PS filters and plug-ins in an attempt to gain added clarity. No joy. Still scratching my bald head.)