It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by James R. Hawkwood
Originally posted by firepilotWRONG.
TVC only helps for close in, and there are other toys I would much rather have. TVC adds weight and yet another system to break. An F-22 would survive quite fine with out it.
Are you joking? You just cannot ignore the results off the TVC research program that spun around the creation off the X-31 and TVC'ed F-16 and F-15...
I mean, double digit kills versus 1 death all due to TVC giving you the supremacy in dogfighting...
The F-22 would be turned to ash if it doesnt have TVC.
Discussing maximum mission radius, Mazanowski presented an air-to-air mission profile in which all the aircraft took off with a weapon load, remained at high altitude and returned after about a minute of combat. All but the F-35 and Su-30MKI were carrying three external fuel tanks.
Under this scenario, the Rafale had a maximum mission radius of 896 n miles, the F/A-18 816 n miles, the F-35 751 n miles, the Eurofighter 747 n miles, the Su-30MKI 728 n miles and the Gripen 502 n miles.
forum.keypublishing.co.uk...
Originally posted by Harlequin
from alot of `online` discussions , once you get out of the frontal aspect of the F-35 , then its game on as it can be seen at killable distances.
Originally posted by James R. Hawkwood
Originally posted by Zaphod58The F-15 S/MTD/ACTIVE had two F100-PW-229 engines with asymmetric thrust vectoring. Initially they had rectangular exhaust nozzles that were only capable of moving along the pitch axis. Under the ACTIVE program it got new engines capable of pitch and yaw vectoring up to 20 degrees. It could be done rather easily without a huge alteration of the aircraft.
Then why does the new f-15 not have TVC then? It makes no sense due to TVC being vital for arial dogfighting.
The fact is that without TVC, the export F-15 or any other "new" figther entering service will not survive on the modern battlefield.
Yes i know the stories about off-bore sight/helm cueing missiles and/or BVR but still the classical dogfighting will happen on current and future battlefields and any advantage to win will be utilised including using TVC in dogfighting.
Originally posted by Aim64C
reply to post by BlueRaja
Thrust vectoring is useful for two things - at low air-speeds, and high angles of attack.
To be fair, Boeing acknowledges the F-15SE’s stealth improvements do not help against ground-based radar systems, which are critical for waging offensive strikes against opponents armed with surface to air missile systems.
Originally posted by CaptainCaveMan
Yeah they should make more F-15's.
They are excellent machines.
Raptor, since looking at the Typhoon
Really, they should make some better F-15's.
Typhoon kicks everything's butt.
It lacks on stealth but how you gonna chase it doing loop the loops
Originally posted by Darkpr0
Check out the head-on picture from the link in the article, you could almost call it an F-18 .
Originally posted by James R. Hawkwood
1: Are the specs upgraded? (longer range, higher speed etc...)
Improving the fourth generation fighter’s profile on air-to-air radar is Boeing’s key goal for the F-15SE
Sounds like this biggest difference will be in the aerodynamics, caused by the internally-carried weaponry cleaning off the wings. Though I doubt it's a huge difference since missiles and whatnot are designed to be reasonably aerodynamic anyway and the mass is still there. As well, could be marginally better roll rates as missile mass is located closer to the longitudinal axis of the plane. Hard to say just how much, though.
2: Does it have TVC? (if yes: 2D or 3D?)
No. That'd be a huge modification on the F-15's entire ass structure for 2D, and I don't think Americans have any mass-production designs for any 3D TVC at this time. I'm still doubtful about asynchronous 2D on future American aircraft as well.
3: How likely is it gonna be bought by other nations?
IMO I suspect that it faces slim chances. It has stiff competition from the F-35, and it seems that the F-15SE's only real advantage is the long list of people waiting for their F-35's to come off the line. Countries who don't feel like waiting for the F-35 might jump ship for the F-15SE, but I don't see very many doing that. If it really comes down to someone wanting to dump the F-35 for other alternatives they would probably look to Europe or even Russia.
for the rest: Potential SU-27/30 killer/rapist.
That may be selling newer Flankers short. If anything, Su-30 (MK plus variants) and Su-35BM are probably going to be competing for the same market space as the F-15SE. Except that Su-30's are already available, and the Su-35BM will still probably come out first for production. Could put some pressure on Boeing if they can't produce a significantly superior product.
Another factor that will reflect on the F-15SE is the rise of 5th generation jets. When the F-15SE finally gets introduced into services around the world (assuming purchase and use) it will be doing so basically in the shadow of 5th generation jets such as the F-35 and the F-22. As well it will face stiff competition as PAK-FA, FGFA, ATD-X, and KFX enter into their own respective services. With the flow of 5th generation technology within those countries (and quite possibly others if the American taboo of selling 5th generation technology doesn't stick elsewhere) the F-15SE will likely become outclassed. And, by the sounds of some of these projects, that time may not be too far away.
Just my thoughts.
Pr0
PS.
To be fair, Boeing acknowledges the F-15SE’s stealth improvements do not help against ground-based radar systems, which are critical for waging offensive strikes against opponents armed with surface to air missile systems.
Interesting choice for a company whose best customer's business is stomping on countries with nothing but land-based air defenses.
Now I'm really done.