correct me if im wrong , but didnt Afghan offer to turn Bin over to a 3rd country back in 01, But ole W wanted his war, i mean daddy had 1, so he said no and destroyed Iraq to get the WMD, (where did they go,). Most other countries dont like to see their young in body bags , just to appease a Presidents lust for infamy, and whats to follow, Bins not going to be waiting poolside at the Hilton, hes going to bolt,prob Iran, .. ... NEXT

Volunteering won't really help, most of our troops are just stationed in Germany doing nothing!

Originally posted by Frankidealist35

---

That's not the point. The point is that NATO is refusing to fight the war on terror. Essentially now they're giving up against terrorism...

Which is exactly the response that Brzezinski anticipated...

he want's central Asia as his plum to pick, go read the 'Grand Chessboard'

the Obama regime is being manipulated into financing the cost, arms, And
Manpower for the Afghanistan operations...
I suggested earlier , in 2010 the american troops will rotate from Iraq to Afghanistan, and come close to the 100,000 level->
50k facing Iran & 50k facing Pakistan

[edit on 19-2-2009 by St Udio]

To be honest, i'm tired of the whole affair. We've been "at war" in Afghanistan and Iraq my entire adult life, and not much has changed, and it looks like not much will change for another decade or more. Why don't we pull out, reinvest all that money and manpower into energy independence and rebuilding our manufacturing base, and let the rest of the world deal with it? We've been dealing with it for about a decade and we're no closer to "destroying terrorism" (as if you could destroy a concept, that's like saying we're at war with hate..) than we were when we first started out over there.

i don't blame them a bit. really. who's going to pay for this?

what if they gave a war and nobody came? we may be about to find out.

[edit on 19-2-2009 by ~Lucidity]