Afghanistan is teetering on the edge of NATO’s remit so invoking the treaty and the NRF is scraping the bottle of the barrel and imho somewhat
undermining the whole purpose of NATO.
However having said that those nations that are involved did so of their own free will and must shoulder part of the burden. But more so this means
relaxing rules of engagement as well as deploying more troops, it’s no good sending 3000 extra troops if they’re going to spend most of their time
in base.
In the end though I think Afghanistan has become folly. The whole purpose of the war, removing Al Qaeda, is never going to be achieved in a practical
sense. They may leave the country but they have clearly just moved their operation to Pakistan; if Pakistan kicks them out they’ll find some other
lawless countryside, and there’s plenty of them, to base themselves. Al Qaeda is too fluid and too amorphous to be pinned down and eradicated; with
hindsight it would in my opinion have been better to allow a militarily primitive country (Afghanistan) host the group allowing for easier monitoring
and if needed military strikes against key targets.
edit -
Originally posted by ItsallCrazy
I hope the UK are going to send some troops over
You're welcome to volunteer. But right now the UK is operating well beyond its limits; sending more troops would cause untold damage and that is
unacceptable without significantly more investment from government.
[edit on 19-2-2009 by Mike_A]
[edit on 19-2-2009 by Mike_A]