It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by theflashor
More proof of our conciousness living in another dimension maybe..
As all these stuff came from peoples imaginations.. Was all these people predicting the future without even knowing it. Was there sub concious giving them clues? and when expressed into art form its easily understood manifests into reality so to speak. Is the illuminaty Symbols more of a predicting ancient practice and if known how to read into them may give us the answers to the future.
If enough people beleive war is innament it usually will be.
If enough people beleive war is not innament it usually wont be.
The world is what we make it.. War is a product of human thought.. Human thought and feeling is passed on from one to another.
Alot of people are saying 2012 is worrying just because of the sheer number of people talking about it. (indeed i think)
Maybe going a bit crazy or might be on to somthing who knows lol.
Originally posted by edgecrusher2199
reply to post by GorehoundLarry
Umm...no. Comics, movies, bands, etc. I think I can speak on behalf of most ATS'ers and say that all of the above are very relevant. For me at least, especially since finding this website, I redefine truth on a daily basis, question everything that needs questioning, and trust very little.
Btw, maybe those lyrics don't fit in directly with American politics and foreign policy, but a 9/11-like event fits in perfectly with those lyrics. Please don't try to educate me on Slayer either. I've been listening to them since I was 15, own all of their albums, and have seen them in concert 4 times. I know ALL about them.
Originally posted by spinkyboo
I keep thinking I've seen it all.
And then .... I haven't.
It just gets weirder and weirder.
I'm thinking time warp.
Serious unthinkable well planned corruption.
230th Contact October 11, 1989, p. 87:
9.36 Billy: Monstrous, really monstrous. It would also be just as monstrous if/when the world trade centre would be destroyed by terrorists with captured commercial
airplanes, through which thousands of people would die, that Bush junior – and
various of his criminal trusted ones knew that then, however undertook nothing
against it. A criminal act that gains Bush the upper hand and he can let loose
against Islam, naturally always under the cloak/veil that they want to free the USA
and the world from terrorism. It would not be discussed that it would be the Bushes
who would bring the greatest terror over the world, at least for the next 15 years.
Originally posted by king9072
So they watch the news, see the plane, go to sleep, and wake up the next day, REMEMBERING A PLANE HIT THE BUILDING.
[edit on 15-2-2009 by king9072]
Originally posted by MrRandomGuy
Originally posted by letthereaderunderstand
I've been thinking that for a long time.
For instance, in Bush's public address immediately after wards he says "We all saw THE PICTURES of the planes flying into the buildings"...which is true, because they were nothing more then pictures with decoy planes flying over the city to make people think they saw planes, which they did, but none went into the buildings, the explosions where exactly what they were...explosions.
The controlled demolitions theory is something plausible, but the no plane theory is too far fetched.
To make the no plane theory true, then you would have to discount thousands of eyewitnesses who SAW the second plane hit.
Think about it. Something exciting or seemingly unreal happens and people flock to it. It is our nature to want to know what's going on. So after the first plane hits the tower, people flock towards it to see what the deal is. That leaves potentially thousands of eyewitnesses watching the second plane hit the tower.
So it's possible the planes could have been faked in pictures. It's possible planes could have been faked on TV, but is it logical to dismiss numerous eyewitnesses who clearly saw the plane crash? No, not very logical at all. No one from New York who was physically present at the time does not make any move to say "there was no plane" right after the event AND (note that it has to be both, not either or because it's possible someone said "there was no plane" out of denial or amazement) a significant time (half a year or more) after the event. Therefore, the no plane theory holds no water.