It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Gun law update: Gun-ban list proposed

page: 2
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 29 2009 @ 11:31 PM
link   
don't they see this will only increase the illegal gun trade

and make it more lucrative,, because they can charge more now




posted on Jan, 30 2009 @ 12:13 AM
link   
Geesh with that list, they might as well ban ALL of them...hey if their banned, i thk that shuold also extend to the military as well, as they will be in possession of illegal firearms then.



posted on Jan, 30 2009 @ 12:27 AM
link   
They can ban guns all they want, If we the people will give them up is another story.



posted on Jan, 30 2009 @ 01:20 AM
link   
Democrats...Theyre in power now, but come next midterm election, they wont be! I am tired of these liberal morons thinking they can force what they think is best for us.

It is not our governments job to confiscate, or tell us what is what. Our government has grown out of control.



posted on Feb, 2 2009 @ 03:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Diplomat
Uhmm... aren't most of those guns they're talking about already illegal?

Streetsweepers? TEC-9's? Mac-11's? AK's?


Not in the US, but I understand that they are in the People's Democratic Republic of Kalifornia.

nenothtu out



posted on Feb, 2 2009 @ 04:00 AM
link   
Let the government decide who can or can't own guns, and they will eventually create a list that includes:


pacifists
home schoolers
debtors
people who listen to the wrong kind of music
people reading banned books
people following the wrong religion
people who live together on a farm in waco
people who attempt to keep their communication private
people who attempt to own property
people who try to change the way government works
people who run a "risk" of using one
tax protesters
the "mentally ill" (who decides what the wrong way of thinking is?)
democrats
republicans
brown people
white people
the "unpatriotic"
people with opinions about different races
people who have ever committed a "crime"
people who question orders
people who think too much
people who don't watch enough TV
"revolutionaries"
people seen in association with "revolutionaries"
"potential terrorists"
people who listen to conspiracy theories
people teaching subjects the government doesn't approve of
people teaching ideas the government doesn't approve of
people teaching.
people related by family to any of the people above


...

and the list goes on.


A law like this is out of the question, simply due to it's potential for abuse







[edit on 2-2-2009 by username371]



posted on Feb, 2 2009 @ 08:38 AM
link   
reply to post by username371
 


Your,right. A law like this has nothing but potential for abuse. Just like every other law ever written. We don't need laws. I understand some organization but laws were systematically put in place to be manipulated to raise revenue and keep in POWER those who put them in place.

These same people who write,pass and break these laws are NEVER held accountable. The only time you see one of them being prosecuted is when they go against the majorities agenda or it will have a negative affect on the majority and they use that person as an example (to appease the people) as if they're actually doing their job.

Tell me, do you need to have someone tell you not to kick somebody's teeth in or rob and kill people? No you have the law written/imbedded in you from natural programming since birth.

These scum keep making laws that manipulate previous laws and it never ends.Does anyone know how many laws are actually in existence?



posted on Feb, 2 2009 @ 12:07 PM
link   
Americans, you must fight hard for the laws, or you may eventually lose them. It begins one way, then goes another. It starts with weaponry that is truly not needed for civilians, then moves on to normal weapons to see how far they can go.

I hope in Russia such weapons don't get proposed for a ban, I will fight for this rights viciously!



posted on Feb, 2 2009 @ 02:09 PM
link   
reply to post by N3krostatic
 


The AR 15 the Mini 14 and a few others listed are semi-auto guns. They are no different that a hunting counterpart in terms of technology. The rest is cosmetic. This is what happens to our Constitution when we give the Liberals all the power.



[edit on 2-2-2009 by projectvxn]



posted on Feb, 3 2009 @ 09:51 AM
link   
I found this video of Obama talking about gun reform.
Dont know if it has been posted. Quailty assured second line.


[edit on 3-2-2009 by TheKingsVillian]



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 06:16 PM
link   
And guess what, Youtube, the propaganda ministry it is has removed the video for a "terms of use violation" guess they don't want the fuhrer to be potrayed in even a slightly negative light or have anything the armed citizenry can use against him.



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by x187x
reply to post by Diplomat
 


they are not illegal , but you would need a class 3 NRA license to own them


The NRA doesn't license anything.

You need a Class 3 FFL to be a dealer in NFA controlled weapons. (full auto's, short barreled shotguns, and such)

This law will apply to the semi-auto versions of these weapons as well, which as of now are federally legal to own. Your state may be a different story though.

Federal Firearms License

[edit on 26-2-2009 by hotrodturbo7]



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 01:36 PM
link   
They can take my guns from my cold dead hands!

Post.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join