It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by donwhite
Gulp! Are you suggesting you are willing to put MORE credence in a by-stander's remark than in King Jesus, one of the Trinity?
Where did you go to theological school? Do they tell you what GOD can do and what GOD cannot do? That must be on heck of a theological school! Who would be so presumptive as to tell GOD he cannot stand here or he cannot stand there. Your "source" is in water over his or her head.
Gallup: 58 Percent Oppose Obama Executive Order on Abortion Barack Obama signed an executive order late in the afternoon on Friday, January 23 to allow taxpayer funds to go to groups overseas that perform or promote abortions. To minimize press coverage, he signed the order in the absence of reporters and photographers, and the White House waited until 7:00 p.m. to issue a press release, in which the president said: "I have no desire to continue this stale and fruitless debate" on abortion. Many in the media praised Obama's decision not to issue the order on January 22, the anniversary of Roe v. Wade as a kind gesture toward pro-lifers. A new Gallup poll shows that Obama may have had something other than the feelings of fragile pro-lifers in mind when he chose to bury the news of his executive order: Obama's decision to reverse the prohibition on funding for overseas family-planning providers may be the least popular thing he has done so far. This was an executive order that forbade federal government money from going to overseas family-planning groups that provide abortions or offer abortion counseling. Fifty-eight percent of Americans disapprove of Obama's decision to lift this ban, while only 35% approve of it. The ban on federal funds to these groups was put in place by Ronald Reagan, but lifted by Bill Clinton. George W. Bush re-instituted the ban after taking office in 2001, but Obama has once again lifted it. No wonder Obama wants to end the "stale and fruitless debate" on abortion. It's a debate he's likely to lose in the light of day.
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by Aermacchi
Yes, friend it is.
What always has amazed me concerning many atheists, is that they feel that they know it all, and thus, have no need for God, since they are all powerful. I call it delusions of grandeur.
Hey Don it isn't easy being a Christian so why should we give the time of day to someone like you who doesn't even try much less ever asked the lord into your heart. The FACT is their ARE things God cannot do and sinning is one of them he cannot be where sin is.
Originally posted by TasteTheMagick
reply to post by Aermacchi
Yeah, back on topic. If a woman is pregnant she has the sole right to decide what happens to her body (and during the pregnancy, the baby IS her body). No one else has this right.
If the woman wants to consider the opinion of some invisible man that lives in the sky, she is free to do so. If the woman does not want to do that, it's her choice to do that as well.
No one should be going around FORCING their religious beliefs on anyone else. The answer is quite simple: If you are a woman, and you decide to get an abortion, go right ahead. If not...don't get an abortion.
Why should a system steeped in outlandish tradition, contradictory teachings, and corruption decide the fate of anybody?
The Vatican is not supposed to go around telling people how to run their lives. Their sole purpose is to perform all their strange little song and dance ceremonies...oh and keep Priests, Bishops, Cardinals and the like under control.
They can't even do that, how can they make a blanket decision for everyone?
Originally posted by kerrichin
my message was not off topic i was replying to a post above where he was bashing women for not using protection and i was saying that men are also responsible.
i used correct lingo for the male part instead of slang.
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
Fifty-eight percent of Americans disapprove of Obama's decision to lift this ban, while only 35% approve of it.
Originally posted by kerrichin
hes responsible for putting this thing there and a woamn can not get pregnant without the sperm.
i suppose its a womans fault when she gets raped then houldnt be so provocotive.
why do the men get out stock free.
im gonna have to not come back to this thread im getting way to angry with this attitude towards women.
Originally posted by DuneKnight
you misunderstood, if you want the woman to decide the consequences of her unborn baby then she has to at least admit that it was her fault...and its always her fault unless she got raped.
[edit on 16-2-2009 by DuneKnight]
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by DuneKnight
you misunderstood, if you want the woman to decide the consequences of her unborn baby then she has to at least admit that it was her fault...and its always her fault unless she got raped.
[edit on 16-2-2009 by DuneKnight]
Fault? Again - Fault?
It still takes two. Responsibility of pregnancy depends on circumstance. If a woman is raped or forced in any manner - NO it is not her fault.
If it is the result of consensual sex - both are responsible.
However - only the woman carries the child - it is her right then to determine to keep it or not.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by DuneKnight
you misunderstood, if you want the woman to decide the consequences of her unborn baby then she has to at least admit that it was her fault...and its always her fault unless she got raped.
[edit on 16-2-2009 by DuneKnight]
Fault? Again - Fault?
It still takes two. Responsibility of pregnancy depends on circumstance. If a woman is raped or forced in any manner - NO it is not her fault.
If it is the result of consensual sex - both are responsible.
However - only the woman carries the child - it is her right then to determine to keep it or not.
Originally posted by kerrichin
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by DuneKnight
you misunderstood, if you want the woman to decide the consequences of her unborn baby then she has to at least admit that it was her fault...and its always her fault unless she got raped.
[edit on 16-2-2009 by DuneKnight]
Fault? Again - Fault?
It still takes two. Responsibility of pregnancy depends on circumstance. If a woman is raped or forced in any manner - NO it is not her fault.
If it is the result of consensual sex - both are responsible.
However - only the woman carries the child - it is her right then to determine to keep it or not.
thank you
i couldnt say it better my self
so i guess the woman has a right to kill herself, since its her body. your logic not mine.
Originally posted by DuneKnight
female philosophy: it takes two wrongs to make a right...
Originally posted byAnnee: However - only the woman carries the child - it is her right then to determine to keep it or not.
Originally posted by DuneKnight: so i guess the woman has a right to kill herself, since its her body. your logic not mine.