Uhm....Yay for U. lawl (Wowspeak)
But, I've never given stock in who he said he was as that was never as interesting and thought provoking as what he said. (This pretty much sums up
what the rest of this post says and is for those who don't like to read.)
More importantly, I've always thought, is what he had to say and the manner in which he countered every comment to come his way with a calm
intelligence, balanced reason and logical rationale. That was always (at least to me) far more interesting and thought provoking than the premise of
who he was. There are certain attributes people exhibit when they are lying, and after reading every post he's ever written 3 times (many, much
more), I'd say those attributes are few and far between...if existent at all. If this was a single person in this time, I'd have no problem stating
them smarter and more reasonable than every self-professed debunker to date. If he had to create a small untrue premise to make people listen and get
his message across, then so be it, as it certainly has done just that.
If there is anything that being on forums for the last 15 years or so has taught me, it's to not come on with and project Bull-$417, for it would
prove an exercise in futility and you would most certainly be torn apart. Do you realize how many people have tried to do just that to him? Yes,
yes...it's much easier to do when someone is no longer around to defend themselves (which is something he wasn't too interested in to begin with),
and highly cowardly I might add, but while he was on...actually responding...no one could touch his logic. No one. THAT, in itself, is what was most
interesting. It wasn't until he apparently left (and has never come back no matter what was said to slander him), that people started doubting what
In case people don't realize it, either from lack of understanding, lack of a 100% comprehension rate while reading or just idle negativity,
everything he's ever said seemingly being wrong is accounted for in the very words (posts) he had to say. Has anyone ever attributed the things he
seemed to get wrong to the fact that he was here in the first place(?) simply postponing the apparently inevitable? To me, his dates are completely
irrelevant, as I remember what he said very well, and I can't say his aura is absent in what I've seen over the last 8 years? In fact, I'd have to
say, the more time progresses, the more I am reminded of what he said.
Sell a book? Who would create such an elaborate hoax only to get the process of selling a book 4 or 5 years later started? Just how long would you
wait for the fruits of your labor? (empty argument)
Even if I don't believe who Titor said he was or what he had to say, I'd still rather believe someone with his level of intelligence, logic and
rationality in the face of counter on every angle (all of which turned out highly inadequate while he was posting), than those who've taken it upon
themselves to take advantage of someone simply because they know he'll never return to counter them. What makes them so sure?
Truly, it doesn't matter who he was in the first place - prophet, naysayer, group of people hired to get some message across, group of college
students carrying out a monumental internet project - all truly irrelevant, IMHO...since it seems, in all logic, that they've received nothing but
idle conflict and shameful dissidence ever since "he" left, yet people are still feeling what "he" said when they see the things they see every
Again, no one
convince me of anything until I do it myself, and I am convinced that his warnings are and should continue to be
heeded if for only the minuscule .0001% chance in hell they could still come true.