It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jd140
reply to post by HunkaHunka
True, the Don't ask Don't tell policy is in place so commanders don't ask if you are gay. That is the DON'T ASK part.
The Don't tell part covers gay soldiers not letting other soldiers know that they are gay. If they do then they are discharged from the military.
If you are openly gay in the military you will be discharged. No questions asked. So yes it is in place to keep openly gays out of the military.
So you are half right.
The Don't ask Don't tell policy is in place for morale and should not be removed.
When you are deployed you have what is called shower tents. They are not private and are very cramped, with hundreds being pushed through every night. How comfortable do you think a young soldier is going to be when he has to shower a foot away from another soldier who he knows to be gay?
Do they shower with the females (if gay male) or with the men (if gay female)? Do they get their own shower time?
Having a gay male showering with other men would be as uncomfortable for the straight men as having females shower with the males.
There are other examples I can come up with if you need them to see that this is a very bad thing to do.
Edit for grammer
[edit on 14-1-2009 by jd140]
Draft Reinstatement bill
To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the favorable treatment afforded combat pay under the earned income tax credit, and for other purposes.
“One of the things that I’ve proposed, for example, is that I will give a $4000 tuition credit - every student, every year - so that they are not being loaded up with enormous debts, uh, but there will be a community service - a national service component. The military could be one way for you to get this $4000 tuition credit. Another way would be to work in an under-served school that needs help. Another way would be to work in an under-served hospital or a homeless shelter, or a veterans home. The point is, I think it is important for young people to serve.”
Well, first of all, as commander-in-chief, my job is to keep America safe. And that means insuring that we’ve got the best military on Earth. And that means having the best persons in uniform on Earth. We have that right now, but as a consequence of these wars, they have been strained incredibly. I think it’s important for us to increase the size of our Army and our Marines so we can reduce the pace of tours that our young men and women are on.
My grandfather, after Pearl Harbor, joined the military. My grandmother, who had just had a baby at Fort Leavenworth, stayed back and worked on a bomber assembly line.
But it’s also important that a president speaks to military service as an obligation not just of some, but of many. You know, I traveled, obviously, a lot over the last 19 months. And if you go to small towns, throughout the Midwest or the Southwest or the South, every town has tons of young people who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. That’s not always the case in other parts of the country, in more urban centers. And I think it’s important for the president to say, this is an important obligation. If we are going into war, then all of us go, not just some. Source
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
I don't see exactly the point of what Obama is doing.
Under UCMJ homosexual behavior will still be illegal and grounds for expulsion from the military. So what he's doing is more lip service than anything.
If the UCMJ is altered there will be morale and camaraderie issues. One silly example is displays of pornography. Often in combat units there are displays of porn, sometimes in tanks or other vehicles. I can only imagine the reaction to some young new private as he posts some gay porn in his vehicle or b hut.
Combat arms units are very heterosexual and testerone driven. The vast majority of these combat personnel are from the Southern US, especially Texas. Open homosexuals will find themselves in an extremely hostile environment in a combat arms unit.
Now Support units are a whole other universe. Obama could probably alter UCMJ in favor of allowing homosexual personnel into Support Units. It would basically be the same policy that is already applied to female personnel.
Now if the military goes full coed, males and females together in coed showers, then Obama could do what ever he wants at that point. There are a number of soldiers who feel if someone openly gay can shower with straight males, then a straight soldier should be able to shower with females. Personally, I'm not for that.
If anything, maybe a desexualizing of the military should occur. Meaning open displays of anything, porn, affection, expression etc. by anyone of any sexual orientation while in uniform, on duty, or on military property would not be tolerated. It could be a zero tolerance policy. I would still keep the current UCMJ code against Sodomy as well. It applies to both straight and gay.
Originally posted by paxnatus
Why can't he stick to the saying "if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
To take the best fighting force in the world and manipulate it to fit his agenda is foolish.
In my opinion he is doing everything to undermine this country and what it stands for.
Our current economic crisis should be where his focus is.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Because it IS broke. If you look at it from the wider view (not just from the eyes of the military), it may make more sense to you.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
This is not about how it will affect the military. This is a civil rights issue. It really doesn't matter how "uncomfortable" someone is going to be in the shower. They're going to have to deal with their own feelings.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Consider if we were forcing black people to wear white makeup to be in the military... That's what the "DADT" policy does. It says, "We'll take your service, your loyalty and dedication - we'll even let you give your life. As long as you hide who you are."
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I'm thrilled that Obama is showing signs of flushing the outdated and cruel civil rights limitations that our citizens have been dealing with for so many years.
Originally posted by jerico65
The military is broken, and the only way to fix it is to allow gays to openly serve?
And that's the attitude you'd have when I'm showering with your daughter?
If gays want to do something for their country, I'm sure they can find other avenues.
And comparing it to race is crazy talk. It's not the same thing.
It's just his way of sucking up
He doesn't care about them or the military.
Originally posted by Common Good
Not to mention "accidental fatalities" in the training fields.
Thats absurd to pair someone up with someone they dont feel comfortable with, especially when their life is at stake.
I say if he wants the gaysto be in the military, give them their own branch.
Originally posted by Common Good
A lot of people in the military arent all there is you know what I mean, a lot of them guys are nuts, and those are going to be the guys whodo it, and guess what, the blood wont beon their hands, it will be on Obamas, cause the military would just cover it up.
Dont be so stupid as to think that everyone in this world cares about the same things you do.
Originally posted by paxnatus
It requires unbreakable trust between each other. You have to know beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the people in your unit, have got your back!!! Otherwise you are going to get one another killed.
Every single time you defend this man, you bring up race!!
If you choose to look at this from the stand point of "please except me as I am" then you are missing the entire point.
The military is their to die for you and I defending our country and its freedoms; not to worry about a soldiers "feelings" getting hurt, or gender identity problems!
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by paxnatus
It requires unbreakable trust between each other. You have to know beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the people in your unit, have got your back!!! Otherwise you are going to get one another killed.
If you trust a person with your life, what the hell does his sexuality have to do with it??? What does the person he loves have to do with his trustworthiness? Nothing.
Every single time you defend this man, you bring up race!!
I'm not defending a man. I'm defending a segment of this country. I'm defending my fellow Americans. I'm defending the Constitution! I felt this way long before I knew who Barack Obama was. Your accusation is not only false, it's pure BS.
If you choose to look at this from the stand point of "please except me as I am" then you are missing the entire point.
I'm not. I'm looking at it from the standpoint of the Constitution. How many times must I iterate that?
The military is their to die for you and I defending our country and its freedoms; not to worry about a soldiers "feelings" getting hurt, or gender identity problems!
Exactly! Those whose "feelings" are bothered by homosexuality need to buck up and realize that their "feelings" of uncomfortableness are their own and they need to deal with them. THEY need to deal with their own gender identity issues.
I know you meant that gay people supposedly have "gender identity issues". That shows me where you're coming from and that there's no need for me to discuss this with you further.
[edit on 15-1-2009 by Benevolent Heretic]
Dont be so stupid as to think that everyone in this world cares about the same things you do.
Why do you have to go into personal attack? Is it because we disagree? Where do you get the idea that I think everyone in this world cares about the same things I do? Why would I be here arguing with you if I thought that?