Originally posted by nikiano
I never said any of that.
No, you never say anything. That's one of debunker's/skeptics favorite tricks. You never come out and say what you truly believe, thus leaving it
all up to speculation for others to guess what you believe.
I already did.
And even if I didn't, does that excuse you putting words into my mouth for no apparent reason?
So when we ask you what you DO believe (as I did), you accuse us of saying that you believe something you don't.
Again, you're simply making things up.
You asked me what I believe and I stated what I believed.
As to what I think happened on 9/11?
hijackers took over planes
hijackers flew planes into buildings with one exception
damage was caused by fire and physical impact
buildings fell down and go boom
Government was too incompetent to put the clues together before it happened so a lot of people died.
This is as basic as I can make it for you.
I didn't accuse of you saying that's what you believed. I ASKED YOU if that is what you believed. And you STILL refuse to answer the
Including what I posted above, I've answered the question 2 times.
A favorite tactic of debunkers.....continue the never-ending arguments.
So you're a debunker then.
All you guys (debunkers) do is make arguments against other people's theories.
Theories require evidence which you don't have.
You debunk everything....everything.
That's a good thing. To debunk something is to prove it false which means it is no longer worth reviewing
Debunking is a good thing
No matter what credible evidence is given, you say it's not credible, and debunk it.
And no matter what evidence I have, you say it's not credible
Yet you refuse to lay out what you believe.
Already did 2 times now. Pay attention.
You refuse to elaborate on any of what you believe.
You refuse to stop acting disrespectful.
If you're going to argue your convictions, at least have the courage to tell us what your convictions are. But you won't. And that's
I've done it already. Obviously you either can't read very well or ignore what I write. Either way, it's your problem, not mine.
Your way of arguing the details without providing a theory of your own shows that you have an interest NOT in carrying on a regular debate (my
version vs your version of what happened) but rather you have a vested interest in arguing the little points in order to keep the truth from coming
I'd love for the truth to come out. Please provide evidence as to what the truth is and I'll gladly look at it. If it's actual scientific
evidence and not speculation, I'll sign up, jump on board, row the boat, wave the flag, anything you need me to do.
You say you are a skeptic, but I say that skeptics have an agenda....
Some do, some don't. I don't. I have a scientific mind and simply am interested in the truth and not propogating falsehoods.
an agenda to keeping people busy arguing about the little details, in order to divert their attention away from seeing the "big picture."
You do this by twisting words and planting old arguments into new hypothesis.
Only did as you asked. You shouldn't have asked unless of course your agenda is to divert this thread away from the truth by starting arguments?
And when someone like me, starts to expose your tactics for what they are, you attack them, and tell them they're not being "adult."
It's not that you disagree with me, it's how you do it. You can disagree in an adult manor or act like a child and insult. You chose the latter
and that is also not my fault or my problem
Skeptics, debunkers, etc.... you all have a vested interest in preventing the truth from coming out. You pretend to hide behind science, but
real scientists always keep an open mind about everything.
Yes everyone is against you. You're the only one who is honest and true fighting the good fight. All those who oppose you must be washed away.
Anyway, if you want to post your theory, I'll continue to debate you. But until you have the courage to post your own theory of what happened,
I call you a debunker and someone who is just on this thread to divert attention away from the "big picture" that I am trying to present.
Ok, so on with my hypothesis.....
I'll be more then happy to post my thoughts and speak with you but not until you act a bit more respectful. You claim I am attacking you yet all
you've done is attack me
If you can act within reason, I'll be more then happy to answer your questions. I have said this approx. 5 time now.
Feel free to ask questions as long as they're adult and reasonable and I will do everything I can to answer them.
The ball is in your court. If you truely are interested, we'll find our very quickly, won't we ?